2016
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual Research Review: Digital health interventions for children and young people with mental health problems – a systematic and meta‐review

Abstract: 16Background: Digital health interventions (DHIs), including computer-assisted therapy, 17

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
546
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 605 publications
(573 citation statements)
references
References 127 publications
(284 reference statements)
19
546
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Matthews & Doherty (2011) found that therapists' confidence with technology was the biggest barrier to the use of mood apps. More qualitative studies are now needed to further explore young peoples' (and clinicians') perceptions (Hollis et al 2016) to broaden our understanding of factors pertinent to the uptake of mood-monitoring apps in real-life settings.…”
Section: Usability Of Mood-monitoring Appsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Matthews & Doherty (2011) found that therapists' confidence with technology was the biggest barrier to the use of mood apps. More qualitative studies are now needed to further explore young peoples' (and clinicians') perceptions (Hollis et al 2016) to broaden our understanding of factors pertinent to the uptake of mood-monitoring apps in real-life settings.…”
Section: Usability Of Mood-monitoring Appsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another recent review study, where authors looked at the use of mobile touch-screen apps by patients with developmental disorders, also suggested that most of the existing studies had suggestive evidence, small subject numbers, and likely biases, as they were often funded and performed by the developers (Stephenson and Limbrick 2015). A systemic meta-review published this year also indicates that the benefits of DHI (Digitized Health Intervention), which includes smart phone apps, are yet without convincing evidence (Hollis et al 2017). Further, without any standardized outcome reporting for app usability or engagement and with numerous studies using varied outcome metrics and clinical scales, the heterogeneity of the mental health app research space has precluded any definitive statements about the effect size or impact of these tools.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a need for evidence from rigorous trials as to the effectiveness of digital interventions for mental health in young people (Hollis et al, 2017), in addition to research investigating how best to integrate these interventions into support provision (Montague, Varcin, Simmons, & Parker, 2015). To plan rigorous trials to examine effectiveness, feasibility trials are needed (National Institute for Health Research, n.d.), and there is a need for feasibility trials to determine the usage and acceptability of digital interventions for youth mental health and the ability to recruit and retain research participants (Grist, Porter, & Stallard, 2017, 2018.…”
Section: Feasibility Trial Of Rezonementioning
confidence: 99%