2018
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part II: Recent changes in prostate cancer trends and disease characteristics

Abstract: Background Temporal trends in prostate cancer incidence and death rates have been attributed to changing patterns of screening and improved treatment (mortality only), among other factors. This study evaluated contemporary national-level trends and their relationships to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing prevalence and explored trends in incidence according to disease characteristics using stage-specific delay-adjusted rates. Methods Joinpoint regression was used to examine changes in delay-adjusted pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

8
175
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 198 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(55 reference statements)
8
175
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although PSA testing prevalence stabilized from 2013 to 2015, the effect of the reduction in screening on the occurrence of advanced disease is being watched closely. Based on analysis of cancer registry data covering 89% of the US population, Negoita et al recently reported that the overall decline in prostate cancer incidence masks an increase in distant stage diagnoses since around 2010 across age and race, although improved staging may have contributed to this trend . The Task Force has revised their recommendation for men aged 55 to 69 years to informed decision making (Grade C) based on an updated evidence review, noting that “screening offers a small potential benefit” of reduced prostate cancer mortality “in some men.”…”
Section: Selected Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although PSA testing prevalence stabilized from 2013 to 2015, the effect of the reduction in screening on the occurrence of advanced disease is being watched closely. Based on analysis of cancer registry data covering 89% of the US population, Negoita et al recently reported that the overall decline in prostate cancer incidence masks an increase in distant stage diagnoses since around 2010 across age and race, although improved staging may have contributed to this trend . The Task Force has revised their recommendation for men aged 55 to 69 years to informed decision making (Grade C) based on an updated evidence review, noting that “screening offers a small potential benefit” of reduced prostate cancer mortality “in some men.”…”
Section: Selected Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for the sharp increase in the prostate cancer death rate in the oldest old men are not known but are thought to be because of misclassification of deaths from other causes on death certificates because of the rapid rise in disease prevalence after the introduction of widespread PSA testing . The subsequent decline in the death rate likely results from earlier detection and improvements in treatment of advanced disease, but it remains unclear why the overall rate in men has recently plateaued . Declines in death rates for lung and colorectal cancers are similar to incidence patterns over the past 2 decades.…”
Section: Selected Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During 2006 through 2015, prostate cancer incidence rates declined annually by 4.5% in NH black men and by 5.5% in NH white men (Table ). It is unclear whether these declines reflect less screening after the 2012 US Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against routine PSA testing, a reduced pool of indolent cancers, and/or combinations of these and other factors …”
Section: Selected Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). The decrease has been attributed to improved surgical and radiologic treatment, the use of hormonal therapy for advanced‐stage disease, and earlier detection through PSA testing . However, the extent of the contribution of PSA testing is particularly unclear.…”
Section: Selected Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%