Annual environmental monitoring report: calendar year 1975. [Mound Laboratory, Ohio]

Farmer, B.M.; Robinson, Brooks; Carfagno, D.G.

doi:10.2172/7195224

Cited by 1 publication

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nearby wells and public supplies are monitored monthly. Concentrations are extremely low (Farmer et al, 1991), even less than in surface water.…”

Section: Water Oualitymentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Tritium and plutonium concentrations, which are probably attributable to Mound operations, are extremely low in the surface water at a maximum of .022% of the DOE DCG values (Farmer et al, 1991). The DOE DCG for tritium is 2,000 x 106 pCi/ml, while the DCG for PU-238 is 40,000 x 10I2 pCilml.…”

Section: Water Oualitymentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The local environment is monitored primarily for these compounds (Farmer, et al, 1991). In addition, thorium-232 was stockpiled at Mound and other heavy radionuclides were involved in several operations.…”

Section: Mound Plantmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These economic development plans could be adversely affected by the storage of waste at the site. (Farmer et al, 1991).…”

Section: On-site Lone Term Storagementioning

confidence: 99%

“…Concentrations off-site are far lower, with none exceeding the MCLs. Full information is available in the environmental monitoring report (Farmer et al, 1991). This contamination is being handled under the Environmental Restoration (ER) Program at Mound.…”

Section: Water Oualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Environmental assessment for Mound Plant decontamination and decommissioning projects, Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

1995

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The U . S . Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an Environmental Assessment (EA) for seven decontamination and decommissioning (D&D) projects at the Mound Plant in Miamisburg, Ohio, that have S t a t e m e n t f o r the Mound F a c i l i t y (June 1979).Based on the information presented in the EA, the DOE has determined that the I not been previously addressed in the F i n a l E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Iproposed action is not a major Federal action significantly I affecting the quality of the human environment within the I

show abstract

“…Nearby wells and public supplies are monitored monthly. Concentrations are extremely low (Farmer et al, 1991), even less than in surface water.…”

Section: Water Oualitymentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Water Oualitymentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Mound Plantmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These economic development plans could be adversely affected by the storage of waste at the site. (Farmer et al, 1991).…”

Section: On-site Lone Term Storagementioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Water Oualitymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Environmental assessment for Mound Plant decontamination and decommissioning projects, Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

1995

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Annual environmental monitoring report: calendar year 1975. [Mound Laboratory, Ohio]

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Environmental assessment for Mound Plant decontamination and decommissioning projects, Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

Environmental assessment for Mound Plant decontamination and decommissioning projects, Mound Plant, Miamisburg, Ohio

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About