2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-009-0321-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annual changes in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus L.) diet in the Bohemian Forest, Czech Republic/Germany

Abstract: The composition of roe deer diet in the Bohemian Forest was analysed with the aim to assess its role in forest habitat altered by bark beetle outbreaks and wind calamities. The annual diet of roe deer was studied at both, Czech and German, sides of the Bohemian Forest using microscopic analyses of faeces. On average, the largest part of the roe deer diet consisted of forbs (32%), followed by three other components-grasses (17%), coniferous trees (13%) and broadleaved trees (11%). Overall the results show that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During the study, signifi cant diff erences in the use of biotopes were detected only in the autumn and winter seasons, when the intensity of using the ecotone zone and full-grown forest was diff erent. This fi nding is probably closely related not only to the food supply, but also to possibilities of fi nding cover (Wahlstrom & Kjellander, 1995;Miyashita et al, 2008), and basically corresponds to knowledge obtained in related species of even-toed ungulates (Mysterud & Østbye, 1995;Barančeková et al, 2009;Ferreti et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…During the study, signifi cant diff erences in the use of biotopes were detected only in the autumn and winter seasons, when the intensity of using the ecotone zone and full-grown forest was diff erent. This fi nding is probably closely related not only to the food supply, but also to possibilities of fi nding cover (Wahlstrom & Kjellander, 1995;Miyashita et al, 2008), and basically corresponds to knowledge obtained in related species of even-toed ungulates (Mysterud & Østbye, 1995;Barančeková et al, 2009;Ferreti et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…unmanaged meadows, clearcuts, Table ) at both the second and third scale of selection (Johnson ). Finally, during winter sites providing cover were sought after when woody plants also form an important food resource for roe deer at a time when availability of herbaceous plants is low because of snow cover (Barančeková et al ). Moreover, the presence of artificial feeding sites could drive roe deer in forested areas at BFNP in winter, in addition to thermal shelter and reduced movement costs linked to thick snow layer (Ewald et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the trade-off between selection of habitat for forage and protection against predation is weak, and of similar magnitude than the one observed at the landscape level. Hence, the landscape of fear might not systematically apply for roe deer at a time when availability of herbaceous plants is low because of snow cover (Barančeková et al 2010). Moreover, the presence of artificial feeding sites could drive roe deer in forested areas at BFNP in winter, in addition to thermal shelter and reduced movement costs linked to thick snow layer (Ewald et al 2014b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seasonality in roe deer has been shown for a variety of parameters, including food selection (Duncan et al 1998;Barancekova et al 2009), elucidated physiological adaptations to adjust food processing in response to changes in seasonal conditions (Rowell-Schäfer et al 2001;Lason 2010), reproductive behaviour (Molinari-Jobin et al 2004;Blottner et al 2006;Klonisch et al 2006;Weyrich et al 2010), and territoriality (Bramley 1970;Hewison et al 1998;Kjellander et al 2004). Three studies have analysed daily and seasonal activity patterns of roe deer (Cederlund 1981, in central Sweden;Jeppesen 1989, in Denmark;Pagon 2010, in Central Italy).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%