Annoyance Caused by Environmental Noise: Elements for Evidence‐Based Noise Policies

Abstract

Because effects of environmental noise do not require extremely high or long exposures, they occur, with different degrees of intensity, in a substantial part of the world population, especially in areas with a dense population and dense transportation networks. As a consequence, noise is a global issue that continues to detract from sustainable development. This article attempts to contribute to evidence-based noise policies by providing a review and systematization of noiseeffects modeling and findings. The results presented can be used in noise abatement policy to find the best practical ways of reducing noise-induced effects through the reduction of noise exposure. At present, it is possible to calculate noise maps showing the exposures to noise in residential areas. With the relationships between exposure and effects as presented here, these can be translated into estimates of the number of people affected. Estimates of effects can be made on the basis of existing noise exposures, but also on the basis of scenarios for future noise levels, so that the consequences of different scenarios can be explored and decisions with respect to noise abatement measures can be optimized. Such an evidence-based approach may be instrumental in reducing the worldwide burden of environmental noise.Environmental noise causes adverse effects, and it is widespread and increasing. Lambert and Vallet (1994) estimated that in the European Union during daytime approximately 77 million people (i.e., 22% of the total population of the EU in 1994) were exposed to transportation noise levels exceeding 65 dB--a level that many countries consider to be unacceptable. Almost 170 million Europeans (49 %) lived in what the authors call gray zones, that is, zones which do not ensure acoustic comfort to residents. Depending on the country, road traffic noise

Relation between Observed and Perceived Traffic Noise and Socio-Economic Status in Urban Blocks of Different Characteristics

“…Babisch et al emphasize the importance of the subjective assessment of noise pollution by those affected [95,96]. Therefore, we argue that the health effect of noise is not independent of the rating on subjective annoyance [83,97]. This raises the questions if habituation [21] (due to a long period of residence) or declining hearing capacity with increasing age could have a positive effect on noise annoyance and thus also on other health outcomes (such as hypertension).…”

On the study of the effects of sea views, greenery views and personal characteristics on noise annoyance perception at homes

“…[1][2][3] It is estimated that about 30% of the population in the European Union suffers from noise annoyance. 4 The number of noise complaints continues to rise sharply in both developed and developing countries.…”

Sense2Health - A Quantified Self Application for Monitoring Personal Exposure to Environmental Pollution

“…This component can be perceived as the component that closes the feedback loop by providing the relevant information to the user. It is worth mentioning that there are various medical studies and research efforts that we can leverage when assessing and correlating environmental pollution and health risks (Miedema, 2007). 4 The Resource Manager ensures the efficiency of the application by tracking power and resource consumption in order to modify the sensing frequency and sampling duration dynamically.…”