1991
DOI: 10.1016/0749-6419(91)90024-s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Announcing a seminar on a new approach for inelastic analysis of structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A first line of research is concerned with extensions of the original theorem to various nonlinear behaviors, such as hardening plasticity (Pham, 2008;Nguyen, 2003), non standard plasticity (Corigliano et al, 1995;Bodovillé and De Saxcé, 2001), contact with friction (Ahn et al, 2008), phase-transformation (Peigney, 2010). A second (and complementing) line of research is concerned with the development of numerical methods for efficiently determining the shakedown domain in the space of load parameters (Zarka et al, 1988;Maitournam et al, 2002;Carvelli et al, 1999;Peigney andStolz, 2001, 2003;Simon and Weichert, 2012;Spiliopoulos and Panagiotou, 2012). We refer to Weichert and Ponter (2014) for more historical details on the development of shakedown theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first line of research is concerned with extensions of the original theorem to various nonlinear behaviors, such as hardening plasticity (Pham, 2008;Nguyen, 2003), non standard plasticity (Corigliano et al, 1995;Bodovillé and De Saxcé, 2001), contact with friction (Ahn et al, 2008), phase-transformation (Peigney, 2010). A second (and complementing) line of research is concerned with the development of numerical methods for efficiently determining the shakedown domain in the space of load parameters (Zarka et al, 1988;Maitournam et al, 2002;Carvelli et al, 1999;Peigney andStolz, 2001, 2003;Simon and Weichert, 2012;Spiliopoulos and Panagiotou, 2012). We refer to Weichert and Ponter (2014) for more historical details on the development of shakedown theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The equivalent stress is shown in equation (5). Bolt tensioner has many advantages such as better accuracy and reliability of tightening load, high tightening load capacity, no torsion stress, no damage on bearing surfaces, easy simultaneous tightening.…”
Section: Tightening With Hydraulic Bolt Tensioner (Refs [1-3])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…independent on any residual stress that may exist initially in the structure. The shakedown theory has been the object of numerous developments, regarding both extensions of the original theorem to various nonlinear behaviors [4,5,6,7,8,9] and numerical methods for assessing the shakedown limits in the case of parametrized loading histories [10,11,12,13,14,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%