2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45554-x_58
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annotated Semantics for Defeasible Deontic Reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, hereafter we assume that the integer n in the complete lattice v T is 3. In order to deal with defeasible deontic reasoning we developed EVALPSN [13], [14] by extending VALPSN. An annotation in EVALPSN called an extended vector annotation has a form of [( , ) : ]…”
Section: Evalpsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, hereafter we assume that the integer n in the complete lattice v T is 3. In order to deal with defeasible deontic reasoning we developed EVALPSN [13], [14] by extending VALPSN. An annotation in EVALPSN called an extended vector annotation has a form of [( , ) : ]…”
Section: Evalpsnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three kinds of annotated logic programs, Annotated Logic Program with Strong Negation (ALPSN for short) for dealing with default reasoning [7], [8], Vector Annotated Logic Program with Strong Negation (VALPSN for short) for dealing with defeasible reasoning [9], [10], [11], and EVALPSN, an extended version of VALPSN, for dealing with defeasible deontic reasoning [13], [14] were introduced by Nakamatsu et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as well as the translation from default theory into ALPSN in [7]. Then, the VALPSN P has two stable models,…”
Section: Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have proposed ALPSN (Annotated Logic Program with Strong Negation) and shown that it can provide the declarative semantics for default reasoning and a non-monotonic ATMS [7,8]. However, ALPSN is not so appropriate for dealing with defeasible reasoning or decision making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we have developed the paraconsistent annotated logic program to deal with inconsistency and some kinds of non-monotonic reasoning in a framework of annotated logic programming by using ontological (strong) negation and the stable model semantics [6], which is called annotated logic program with strong negation (ALPSN for short). Later, to deal with defeasible reasoning [14], we proposed a new version of ALPSN called vector annotated logic program with strong negation (VALPSN for short) and applied it to resolving conflicts [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%