2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-014-1618-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annotated comparisons of proposed preprocessing techniques for script recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

8
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To remove unwanted information present in acquired images, different preprocessing methods are used (Saba, Almazyad, & Rehman, ; Saba, Rehman, Al‐Dhelaan, & Al‐Rodhaan, ; Saba, Rehman, Altameem, & Uddin, ; Saba, Rehman, & Sulong, ). Tahir et al () conducted a comprehensive study of preprocessing techniques and their effect on feature extraction from medical images.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To remove unwanted information present in acquired images, different preprocessing methods are used (Saba, Almazyad, & Rehman, ; Saba, Rehman, Al‐Dhelaan, & Al‐Rodhaan, ; Saba, Rehman, Altameem, & Uddin, ; Saba, Rehman, & Sulong, ). Tahir et al () conducted a comprehensive study of preprocessing techniques and their effect on feature extraction from medical images.…”
Section: Proposed Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This image will be having a noise that makes the OCR to erroneously recognize the characters [15]. This is rectified by applying some preprocessing techniques to smoothen or sharpen the image and to remove the noise in it [16]. At first the image that is taken is converted into black and white using preprocessing methods and then only segmentation is carried out [17].…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical features include texture measurements, grapheme distributions, grey-level statistics and crosscorrelation distributions. These features are normally extracted from handwriting fragments and are effectively employed for classification (Hussain et al, 2017;Saba et al, 2014c;.…”
Section: Research Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%