1968
DOI: 10.1070/pu1968v011n02abeh003804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annihilation of Positrons in Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus bound states exist for µ < µ c or, in terms of imaginary Debye radius, for |r D | > a B /3. The Sedov method [34,35] does not work in the present case, thus an exact or, at least, a precise (if finite) value of the critical parameter η c is an open question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus bound states exist for µ < µ c or, in terms of imaginary Debye radius, for |r D | > a B /3. The Sedov method [34,35] does not work in the present case, thus an exact or, at least, a precise (if finite) value of the critical parameter η c is an open question.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Let us consider the ground s-state by putting n = 1. It follows from the equations ( 10)-( 12 An analytical method was developed by Sedov [34] for determining the critical screening parameter for the Yukawa potential v(ρ) = −exp(−ηρ)/ρ. It was then applied to the related exponential cosine screened Coulomb (ECSC) potential [35].…”
Section: The Variational Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFM ordering in γ‐Fe–Mn was established in 1956. Sedov () showed that in the composition range of 13–44 at% Mn, the susceptibility is temperature independent above the Néel temperature, implying that localized moments are absent in the PM state. In their seminal work, Ishikawa and co‐workers established a magnetic phase diagram of γ‐Fe–Mn in the entire composition range.…”
Section: Calphad Approaches For Magnetic Transitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%