2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.diamond.2019.02.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annealing effect of surface-activated bonded diamond/Si interface

Abstract: Highlights•Diamond/Si bonding interface could withstand a load of high temperature as high as 800 °C.•The amorphous layer observed at the bonding interface decreased with annealing temperature.•The residual stress released in the diamond of the bonding interface decreased with annealing temperature.•The residual stress formed in the bonding interface annealed at 1000˚C is much smaller than that of diamond grown on Si.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The bonding interface with high thermal stability was contributed to the atomic intermixing layer formed at the bonding interface that 13 played a role of relaxing thermal stress caused by the difference in thermal expansion coefficients between diamond and Si. Similar results have been found at Si/diamond interface fabricated by SAB [16] The heat of the GaAs TLM pattern is mainly generated in the active region and spreads out down to the substrate. The thermal resistance of the GaAs TLM pattern is the sum of the thermal resistance of the GaAs layer and the diamond or sapphire substrate, which could be calculated using the following equations [26]:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bonding interface with high thermal stability was contributed to the atomic intermixing layer formed at the bonding interface that 13 played a role of relaxing thermal stress caused by the difference in thermal expansion coefficients between diamond and Si. Similar results have been found at Si/diamond interface fabricated by SAB [16] The heat of the GaAs TLM pattern is mainly generated in the active region and spreads out down to the substrate. The thermal resistance of the GaAs TLM pattern is the sum of the thermal resistance of the GaAs layer and the diamond or sapphire substrate, which could be calculated using the following equations [26]:…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The direct bonding of Si and diamond using SAB method has been reported [14]. More importantly, the SAB-fabricated Si/diamond interface demonstrated extremely high thermal stability (up to 1000 °C) and high applicability [15,16]. However, the only flaw is that there was a thick amorphous carbon layer formed at the bonding interface due to the Ar fast atom beam (FAB) irradiation in the surface activation process, which will largely degrade the interfacial physical property and mechanical strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The amorphous layer should play a role in relieving stress caused by the difference in thermal expansion coefficient between diamond and InGaP. A similar result has been reported for the diamond/Si interface fabricated by SAB [21]. After annealing at 400 °C, the increased amorphous layer thickness is more helpful in the relaxation of the stress.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…A similar result was reported for a Si/diamond interface fabricated by SAB. [ 31 ] At 500 °C, the compressive stress in the as‐bonded and 700 °C‐annealed GaN/diamond heterointerfaces increased to 0.81 and 0.74 GPa, which was larger than that (0.41 GPa) of the GaN grown on Si. This difference was mainly due to the thermal lattice expansion coefficient mismatch between diamond and GaN, which was larger than that between Si and GaN.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%