1993
DOI: 10.1063/1.354474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Annealing behavior of MeV implanted carbon in silicon

Abstract: The annealing behavior of carbon implanted at 1.3 MeV with a dose of 5×1019 ions/m2 into Czochralski-grown silicon wafers is investigated using an x-ray double-crystal method, transmission electron microscopy, secondary-ion-mass spectroscopy, and infrared-absorption spectroscopy. For comparison, the behavior of boron implanted at 2.0 MeV with 5×1019 ions/m2 is also investigated. X-ray rocking curve analysis shows that carbon produces a larger lattice strain than boron. For the samples annealed at 1273 K, x-ray… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, it has been reported that C coimplantation can be used to reduce TED of B. 41,42 This reduction has been attributed [43][44][45] to the fact that the implanted C provides a sink for excess interstitials during annealing. The efficacy of C coimplantation in suppressing TED is limited by the fact that the C needs to getter its own interstitial damage in addition to the interstitials from the dopant implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recently, it has been reported that C coimplantation can be used to reduce TED of B. 41,42 This reduction has been attributed [43][44][45] to the fact that the implanted C provides a sink for excess interstitials during annealing. The efficacy of C coimplantation in suppressing TED is limited by the fact that the C needs to getter its own interstitial damage in addition to the interstitials from the dopant implant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, the nature of these complexes is not known yet. Isomae et al suggested that they could be SiC precipitates; 17 from volume considerations it is expected that Si and C coprecipitation occurs with the ratio 1:1, 18 but, if this can explain the absence of dislocations in C-implanted silicon ͑the number of displaced silicon atoms which forms dislocation loops is roughly equal to the implanted dose 19 ͒, it does not clarify how C can also trap the extra silicon interstitials produced by ion implantation of other elements such as B or P.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 5(a) and (b) show proximity gettering by implanting oxygen or carbon ions [35] before and after epitaxial growth. Another option for gettering sinks is the use of interfacial misfit dislocations as shown in Fig.…”
Section: A Optimizing Gettering Capability Of Nc Epi In Ulsi Processmentioning
confidence: 96%