2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41534-021-00371-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anneal-path correction in flux qubits

Abstract: Quantum annealers require accurate control and optimized operation schemes to reduce noise levels, in order to eventually demonstrate a computational advantage over classical algorithms. We study a high coherence four-junction capacitively shunted flux qubit (CSFQ), using dispersive measurements to extract system parameters and model the device. Josephson junction asymmetry inherent to the device causes a deleterious nonlinear cross-talk when annealing the qubit. We implement a nonlinear annealing path to corr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(70 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need for increased flexibility of the annealing schedules, including independent control of the transverse fields, has been widely recognized (see Ref. [33] and references therein), putting such capabilities on the roadmap for future devices [29,31,34,44,45].…”
Section: Magnetic Frustration and Suppression Of Tunnelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The need for increased flexibility of the annealing schedules, including independent control of the transverse fields, has been widely recognized (see Ref. [33] and references therein), putting such capabilities on the roadmap for future devices [29,31,34,44,45].…”
Section: Magnetic Frustration and Suppression Of Tunnelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we first introduce a simple model of magnetic frustration to show that quantum tunneling effects can be leveraged to create a small avoided level crossing. We then introduce a means of creating an additional avoided crossing via customized annealing schedules [32][33][34] that allows us to sketch a heuristic algorithm for finding lower-energy eigenstates of the problem than in AQA under certain circumstances. We also provide a statistical analysis of randomly generated examples to demonstrate the performance of LSTF-DQA and we analyze in detail a single instance to discuss the consequences of its application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This single unit method of identifying both the qubit and coupler's spin components is not as universally applicable as more general means such as the Schrieffer-Wolff transformation [60], particularly in the strong coupling regime. However, as we will restrict our analysis to the weak coupling limit, the results of the two methods coincide [16,[61][62][63]. With these assumptions, the behavior of the physical device can be mapped to the one-dimensional, transverse field Ising spin model.…”
Section: Fig 2 Single Coupler Behavior A)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally we note that commercial annealers do not yet offer the ability to control the transverse fields of the qubits independently [44]. The need for increased flexibility of the annealing schedules, including independent control of the transverse fields, has been widely recognized (see [33] and references therein), putting such capabilities on the roadmap for future devices [29,31,34,45,46].…”
Section: Magnetic Frustration and Suppression Of Tunnelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, we first introduce a simple model of magnetic frustration to show that quantum tunneling effects can be leveraged to create a small avoided level crossing. We then introduce a means of creating an additional avoided crossing via customized annealing schedules [32][33][34] that allows us to sketch a heuristic algorithm for finding lower energy eigenstates of the problem than in AQA under certain circumstances. We also provide a randomly generated example to demonstrate LSTF-DQA and discuss the consequences of its application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%