“…1 Recent studies have reported ankle instability in children. 25,26,[34][35][36] In our series, it was found that harvested donor fibular lengths were not significantly different between adults and children. The length of the residual fibula was, however, significantly longer in adults as compared with children (P < .048).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…More recently, other studies have been conducted to attempt to quantify the risk of developing ankle instability at the donor site after a vascularized fibular graft procedure. [23][24][25][26][27][28] These studies provide compelling evidence for the occurrence of this complication after the procedure. However, because age and the degree of skeletal maturity were not well characterized, it is difficult to draw conclusions on the risk factors for development of ankle instability.…”
“…1 Recent studies have reported ankle instability in children. 25,26,[34][35][36] In our series, it was found that harvested donor fibular lengths were not significantly different between adults and children. The length of the residual fibula was, however, significantly longer in adults as compared with children (P < .048).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…More recently, other studies have been conducted to attempt to quantify the risk of developing ankle instability at the donor site after a vascularized fibular graft procedure. [23][24][25][26][27][28] These studies provide compelling evidence for the occurrence of this complication after the procedure. However, because age and the degree of skeletal maturity were not well characterized, it is difficult to draw conclusions on the risk factors for development of ankle instability.…”
“…The medical literature regarding donor-site morbidity is conflicting. 4,13,[17][18][19][20] Although the technique of harvesting the fibula medially was reported in the 1980s, 21 it has gained little acceptance by microvascular reconstructive surgeons; thus no reports of its donor-site morbidity exist. Therefore this study was conducted to describe and compare the donor-site morbidity of these 2 approaches, to assess the medial approach as an alternative surgical approach.…”
“…Surgery using fibula was first performed by Taylor in 1975 and while the overwhelming number of cases have been satisfactory, some authors have reported late period problems including instability, muscle weakness and pain in the ankle from which the fibula was harvested [1,17,46]. Usually the donor site is the fibula on the healthy side and, in many cases, this is the only viable option.…”
Although there is little doubt that the scapular flap is a versatile flap that is suitable for most tissue defects, it has failed to gain its proper place in the reconstructive armamentarium. This may be due to the perceived donor site morbidity. However, many published articles have shown that the donor site morbidity is limited and acceptable. The scapular free flap is accessible, relatively easy to dissect and has a long vascular pedicle with a constant position of artery and veins. The donor site may be closed primarily for flaps that do not exceed 10 cm in width. It is usually hairless, and is ideal for intermediate-sized defects. There is no functional donor site deficit and the resulting scar is acceptable. No major artery is sacrificed. The independent arc of skin flap rotation relative to the bone component is another major advantage over other flaps. Therefore, I believe that the scapular free flap is a superior and adaptable flap in most skin and/or bone defect reconstructions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.