The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1989
DOI: 10.1097/00000637-198905000-00021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ankle Instability of the Donor Site Following Removal of Vascularized Fibula Bone Graft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Recent studies have reported ankle instability in children. 25,26,[34][35][36] In our series, it was found that harvested donor fibular lengths were not significantly different between adults and children. The length of the residual fibula was, however, significantly longer in adults as compared with children (P < .048).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Recent studies have reported ankle instability in children. 25,26,[34][35][36] In our series, it was found that harvested donor fibular lengths were not significantly different between adults and children. The length of the residual fibula was, however, significantly longer in adults as compared with children (P < .048).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…More recently, other studies have been conducted to attempt to quantify the risk of developing ankle instability at the donor site after a vascularized fibular graft procedure. [23][24][25][26][27][28] These studies provide compelling evidence for the occurrence of this complication after the procedure. However, because age and the degree of skeletal maturity were not well characterized, it is difficult to draw conclusions on the risk factors for development of ankle instability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The medical literature regarding donor-site morbidity is conflicting. 4,13,[17][18][19][20] Although the technique of harvesting the fibula medially was reported in the 1980s, 21 it has gained little acceptance by microvascular reconstructive surgeons; thus no reports of its donor-site morbidity exist. Therefore this study was conducted to describe and compare the donor-site morbidity of these 2 approaches, to assess the medial approach as an alternative surgical approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery using fibula was first performed by Taylor in 1975 and while the overwhelming number of cases have been satisfactory, some authors have reported late period problems including instability, muscle weakness and pain in the ankle from which the fibula was harvested [1,17,46]. Usually the donor site is the fibula on the healthy side and, in many cases, this is the only viable option.…”
Section: Lower Extremity Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%