2012 12th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2012) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/humanoids.2012.6651514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ankle, hip and stepping strategies for humanoid balance recovery with a single Model Predictive Control scheme

Abstract: While humans are highly efficient in dealing with balance perturbations, current biped humanoid robots are far from showing similar skills. This is mainly due to the limited capacity of current robot controllers to deal with the inherently complex dynamics of biped robots. Though Model Predictive Control schemes have shown improved robustness to perturbations, they still suffer from a few shortcomings such as not considering the upper body inertial effects or nonoptimal step durations. We propose here a Model … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other approaches for walking stabilization include quick modifications of the CoP reference based on perceived disturbances [21], or posture and force control to simplify the robot walking dynamics [12]. [34] and [1] express stepping strategies within a model predictive control scheme. In [38], a modified version of preview control based on the LIPM is used as a unified way to realize walking pattern generation and stepping for push recovery.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches for walking stabilization include quick modifications of the CoP reference based on perceived disturbances [21], or posture and force control to simplify the robot walking dynamics [12]. [34] and [1] express stepping strategies within a model predictive control scheme. In [38], a modified version of preview control based on the LIPM is used as a unified way to realize walking pattern generation and stepping for push recovery.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior approaches have either used the internal joints of the robot to resist disturbances (e.g. ankle strategy, hip strategy [1], [2], or inertial shaping [3]) or external contacts (e.g., protective stepping [4], knee contact [5], hand contact [6], [7]). However, these strategies have been considered in isolation and there have been limited attempts to unify multiple strategies into a single fall mitigation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the continuous side, nonlinear MPC schemes have been proposed using Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) [5] or Interior Point (IP) methods [6]. On the discrete side, these MPC schemes have been formulated as Mixed Integer Quadratic Programs [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%