2021
DOI: 10.3390/rs13091714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropy Parameterization Development and Evaluation for Glacier Surface Albedo Retrieval from Satellite Observations

Abstract: Glacier albedo determines the net shortwave radiation absorbed at the glacier surface and plays a crucial role in glacier energy and mass balance. Remote sensing techniques are efficient means to retrieve glacier surface albedo over large and inaccessible areas and to study its variability. However, corrections of anisotropic reflectance of glacier surface have been established for specific shortwave bands only, such as Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (L5/TM) band 2 and band 4, which is a major limitation of current… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modeled glacier albedo in the uppermost zones of the catchment (>6,000 m.a.s.l.) gives a slight bias compared to the LS8 observations and matches the ST2 data well especially during winter, which points to the discrepancy between the two remotely sensed products and associated uncertainties (Ren et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The modeled glacier albedo in the uppermost zones of the catchment (>6,000 m.a.s.l.) gives a slight bias compared to the LS8 observations and matches the ST2 data well especially during winter, which points to the discrepancy between the two remotely sensed products and associated uncertainties (Ren et al., 2021).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We derived glacier albedo values from Landsat 8, “LS8,” and Sentinel 2, “ST2,” following the approach of Ren et al. (2021) (Text S4.3 in Supporting Information ) and compared them to simulated mean glacier albedo values (excluding debris‐covered areas) per 200 m elevation band (Figure 3b). Modeled glacier albedo reproduces the seasonal cycle at lowest elevation (4,800–5,000 m.a.s.l.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4, Azha, and Xueyougu Glaciers revealed additional insights on temporal and spatial changes (Figure 5). We have improved and evaluated a method to correct glacier and snow reflectance for anisotropy and retrieve better albedo (hemispherical reflectance) [21]. The anisotropy correction was developed using airborne directional measurements of spectral reflectance and comparing alternate parameterizations [21].…”
Section: Research Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have improved and evaluated a method to correct glacier and snow reflectance for anisotropy and retrieve better albedo (hemispherical reflectance) [21]. The anisotropy correction was developed using airborne directional measurements of spectral reflectance and comparing alternate parameterizations [21]. This method was applied to retrieve glacier albedo in the entire WNM using MODIS data for the period 2001-2020 (Figure 6).…”
Section: Research Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this approach still retains some mixed pixels that can lead to low albedo, it is an inevitable compromise since the limited number of MODIS pixels with 100% glacier fractional abundance was insufficient to capture spatial patterns and changes of albedo in the WNM. The method applied to retrieve albedo in this study was developed for clean ice (Ren and others, 2021), so the debris-covered glaciers were excluded. The impact of excluding debris-covered glaciers on regional glacier albedo was limited, since these glaciers account for 2% of total glacier area only.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%