2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00173-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropy effects on the fatigue behaviour of rolled duplex stainless steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
23
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This orientation of the microstructure is often held responsible for mechanical anisotropy and can result in considerable variation of the fatigue limit, depending on the fiber orientation. This variation has been reported as being 35% for 42CrMo4 steel [1] and 15% for a duplex stainless steel [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This orientation of the microstructure is often held responsible for mechanical anisotropy and can result in considerable variation of the fatigue limit, depending on the fiber orientation. This variation has been reported as being 35% for 42CrMo4 steel [1] and 15% for a duplex stainless steel [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…For instance, Mateo [2] and Lütjering [10] showed that for a duplex stainless steel and an aluminium alloy the anisotropic monotonic mechanical properties do not necessarily follow the same trend as the anisotropic high cycle fatigue behaviour. They reported that the layered or pancake microstructure in the rolled plate from which the specimens were machined causes a significant drop in the fatigue limit when the effective slip length is a maximum.…”
Section: Experimental Anisotropic Fatigue Behaviour In Metallic Matermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este evento foi observado tanto na amostra do aço no estado como recebido (Figura 5-a) quanto nas amostras do aço após todos os tratamentos térmicos (Figuras 5-a até 5-g) e pode estar relacionado com a orientação cristalográfica de cada fase. Mateo et al [20] e El Bartali et al [21], ao caracterizar aços inoxidáveis duplex laminados, observaram que a fase α tende ao desenvolvimento de textura, fato que pode explicar a dissolução uniforme desta fase, uma vez que a maioria dos grãos estão orientados aproximadamente na mesma direção. Por outro lado, a fase γ pode ter apresentado diferentes graus de dissolução devido a sua ausência de textura, ou seja, maior aleatoriedade de orientação cristalográfica.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The variation in the fatigue resistance can be up to 35% for a 42CrMo4 steel [1] and 15% for stainless steel [2]. Certain forging simulation software is now capable of predicting the fibering orientation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%