2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.214509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropy and reversible magnetization of the infinite-layer superconductorSr0.9La0.1CuO

Abstract: We present reversible magnetization measurements of a c-axis aligned Sr 0.9 La 0.1 CuO 2 infinite-layer superconductor with T c Ӎ43 K. The magnetization measured as a function of temperature and angle between the c axis and the external magnetic field are analyzed in terms of the Hao-Clem model. Consequently, the critical fields ͓H c (0), H c1 c (0), and H c2 c (0)] and the characteristic lengths ͓ ab (0) and ab (0)] are derived. We introduce a novel technique to describe the angular dependence of magnetizatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking both sources of errors into account yielded: λ ab (0) = 157(15) nm and λ c (0) = 1140(100) nm. The value of λ ab (0) obtained here was in a good agreement with the λ ab (0) = 147(7) nm reported by Kim et al [38] based on the analysis of reversible magnetization data. In order to test the predictions of [18][19][20][21][22] and in analogy to our previous results on cuprate HTSs [15][16][17]34], the experimental data presented in Figure 2 were analyzed by decomposing λ −2 ab (T) and λ −2 c (T) into two contributions with s-wave and d-wave symmetry [39]:…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Taking both sources of errors into account yielded: λ ab (0) = 157(15) nm and λ c (0) = 1140(100) nm. The value of λ ab (0) obtained here was in a good agreement with the λ ab (0) = 147(7) nm reported by Kim et al [38] based on the analysis of reversible magnetization data. In order to test the predictions of [18][19][20][21][22] and in analogy to our previous results on cuprate HTSs [15][16][17]34], the experimental data presented in Figure 2 were analyzed by decomposing λ −2 ab (T) and λ −2 c (T) into two contributions with s-wave and d-wave symmetry [39]:…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The curves systematically shift towards the left with the increase in the applied magnetic field. Similar shifting in the reversible magnetization curves has also been observed in the case of conventional [36] as well as layered superconductors [37]. The match between the theoretical and experimental results is very good.…”
Section: Reversible Magnetizationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We note that the positive curvature in H c2 (T ) presented here is triggered by defects/phase inhomogeneities cannot be excluded. For comparison, the H c2 measured for the [(IL-CaCuO 2 ) n /(Ca 2 Fe 2 O 5 ) m ] N superlattices is larger than that of 13.9 T reported for electron-doped IL-cuprates, where T c is higher rather than the superlattices presented here [45]. Using H * c2 (0) = 28.03 T, we calculated a coherence length ξ = (φ 0 /2πH * c2 (0)) 1/2 for the [(IL-CaCuO 2 ) n /(Ca 2 Fe 2 O 5 ) m ] N superlattices and obtained ξ = 34.3 Å.…”
Section: Direct Comparison Of Structural Imaging Data Between [(Il-contrasting
confidence: 67%