2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.04.054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropy analysis of ultra-fine grain graphite and pyrolytic carbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The derivation of the relationship between φ and g is not included here and any reader requiring further detail should consult reference. 62 Using pole intensity data such as that shown in Fig. 13b, Sutton and Howard 48 defined the relationship between bulk CTE and crystal CTE using the following relationship:…”
Section: Averaging Porosity and Orientation Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The derivation of the relationship between φ and g is not included here and any reader requiring further detail should consult reference. 62 Using pole intensity data such as that shown in Fig. 13b, Sutton and Howard 48 defined the relationship between bulk CTE and crystal CTE using the following relationship:…”
Section: Averaging Porosity and Orientation Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To help the reader understand the basis of the Bacon 46 techniques used by Sutton and Howard 48 the experimental technique is briefly outlined below. However the reader is encouraged to refer to a recent paper by Campbell 62 which describes the experimental technique and method of analysis in detail.…”
Section: Averaging Porosity and Orientation Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unirradiated and irradiated Gilsocarbon graphites were machined into plates with l × w × d dimensions of 18 × 8 × 3 mm and a 2.8 mm hole at the centre. The anisotropic properties of Gilsocarbon (1:1.1 ratio as defined by the with and against grain coefficient of thermal expansion ratio in unirradiated graphite), caused by the preferential orientation of crystallite domains and aligned micro/nano-cracks perpendicular to the moulding/pressing (along the billets main axis) direction [38,39], means that the direction of machining requires careful consideration. In order to minimise potential mechanical performance differences resulting from bias within the graphite brick, all samples were machined such that the l × w × d of the plates equated to cuts in the graphite billet axial, radial and azimuth directions, see Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%