2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2013.08.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic wettability of laser micro-grooved SiC surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerical model was calibrated using experimental published data [4]. Good agreement was found between the experimental data and our lattice Boltzmann simulation (Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations By Lattice Boltzmann Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerical model was calibrated using experimental published data [4]. Good agreement was found between the experimental data and our lattice Boltzmann simulation (Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations By Lattice Boltzmann Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, on anisotropic surfaces where properties of surface will change in different directions [2,3], the wettability of surface is often anisotropic. Apparent contact angle is usually smaller in direction perpendicular to surface anisotropy (θ ⊥ ) and larger in parallel direction (θ ) as presented by Ma et al in [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Surface morphology plays an important role in solid surface wettability, which has wide applications in engineering practices, such as mechanical seals [1][2][3][4]. Protuberant morphology and concave morphology are two typical textures, which are represented by circle-dimpled and micro-squareconvex morphology, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tailoring a surface with parallel structures can be an example, it has been shown [7][8][9][10][11][12] that a drop spreads preferably along the grooves, resulting in an elongated shape with a large difference in terms of contact angle, depending on the direction of the drop observation. The most commonly used models of wetting on rough and nonhomogeneous surfaces, Wenzel's [13] and Cassie-Baxter's models [14], cannot predict directly the variations of contact angle when the surface is anisotropic [5,11], especially when the size of the drop has the same order as the size of the texture [10]. The sharp grooves obtained by Hans et al [5] on copper alloys makes the contact angle vary along the drop contact line, with a difference up to 25% (from 75° to 95° approximately) for parallel and perpendicular direction of observation respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%