2016
DOI: 10.1007/s12274-016-1029-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic nanowire growth via a self-confined amorphous template process: A reconsideration on the role of amorphous calcium carbonate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since Mg 2+ stabilizes ACP, , the Mg-rich amorphous layer at the surface hindered the lateral growth of the nanorods during the growth of the FPN-M arrays. This resulted in the formation of fine FPN-M nanorods. , The aforementioned phenomenon is also observed in the human tooth, shark tooth, rodent tooth, and nacre …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since Mg 2+ stabilizes ACP, , the Mg-rich amorphous layer at the surface hindered the lateral growth of the nanorods during the growth of the FPN-M arrays. This resulted in the formation of fine FPN-M nanorods. , The aforementioned phenomenon is also observed in the human tooth, shark tooth, rodent tooth, and nacre …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This resulted in the formation of fine FPN-M nanorods. 27,38 The aforementioned phenomenon is also observed in the human tooth, 27 shark tooth, 18 rodent tooth, 24 and nacre. 29 3.3.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In this sense, the situation is rather analogous to additive incorporation into the mineral phase, where the main effect is the lowering of supersaturation and a weak inhibition of nucleation, as discussed in Section 2.1. Also, in such mesophases, confinement effects can become important [32][33][34], and the increased viscosity may play an additional role toward inhibition effects. In our opinion, the observed facilitation of nucleation in such phases [28] can be better explained within the notions of "non-classical" nucleation theories as described below (Section 3.2).…”
Section: Additive Mesophases As Environments For Nucleationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no amorphous layer was found at the edge of FAP nanorods after 96 h for complete mineralization (Figure S12). It can be reasonably inferred that the amorphous layer on the surface of nanorods will limit their lateral growth and form finer nanorods controlled by Mg 2+ . ,, During the mineralization process of the FAP array, thicker nanorods will eventually be formed due to the lack of restriction of the surface amorphous layer. On the contrary, the amorphous layer on the edge of each nanorod in the samples controlled by Mg 2+ generated inherent surface stresses to confine the size of nanorods.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%