2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.94.224411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic long-range spin systems

Abstract: We consider anisotropic long-range interacting spin systems in d dimensions. The interaction between the spins decays with the distance as a power law with different exponents in different directions: we consider an exponent d1 + σ1 in d1 directions and another exponent d2 + σ2 in the remaining d2 ≡ d − d1 ones. We introduce a low energy effective action with non analytic power of the momenta. As a function of the two exponents σ1 and σ2 we show the system to have three different regimes, two where it is actua… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(151 reference statements)
2
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. Note that the equilibrium phase diagram of the long-range Kitaev chain radically differs from the one of the long-range quantum Ising model [37,38].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2. Note that the equilibrium phase diagram of the long-range Kitaev chain radically differs from the one of the long-range quantum Ising model [37,38].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this work, we deal with the previous issues by first considering the case of classical O(N ) models in dimension d ≥ 2 for weak LR interactions, see Sections II-III. The goal of these sections is to review the FRG treatment for classical models and to set up the ground for the study of the quantum case, which is the subject of Sections IV-IV C. Our presentation is based on the formalism developed and the results obtained in [27][28][29], while the presentation follows the one in [30]. Our main objectives is to present such findings in an unified and compact way, providing as well details on the derivations and new results on the topic of weak LR spin systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.2, the series of data m H /∆ terminate around σ ≈ 1.6 (D ≈ 2.25). Such a feature is supported by the analytic formula (12) in the sense that for large σ (large ǫ), the Higgs particle becomes obscure nonetheless. We make a brief overview for the fixed-D = 3(= 2 + 1)-lattice analyses.…”
Section: Comparison With the Preceding Results Via The σ ↔ D Relationmentioning
confidence: 85%