2001
DOI: 10.1086/320349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic Interstellar Scattering toward the Cygnus Region

Abstract: We were unable to reliably determine scattering disk parameters for 2021]317 at frequencies from 8.5 GHz down to 1.67 GHz because of its complex intrinsic source structure. The scattering disks are elliptical with axial ratios of about 0.75 : 1 with little measurable variation between these sources. We interpret our measurements as due to the e †ects of anisotropic interstellar turbulence. The anisotropy parameters, axial ratio and position angle, for those sources for which we have data at multiple frequencie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
34
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
7
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean value for the image elongation is ¼ 1:2. This value is comparable to that measured for Cyg X-3 (%1.3, Wilkinson et al 1994;Molnar et al 1995) and NGC 6334B (1.2-1.5; Trotter et al 1998), within the range of anisotropies measured for the extragalactic sources seen through the Cygnus region (1.1-1.8; Spangler & Cordes 1988Desai & Fey 2001), and somewhat smaller than the value measured for the OH masers toward W49N (2-3; Desai et al 1994) and the Galactic center (%2.5; Frail et al 1994). Romani et al (1986) have predicted the anisotropy that would be induced, even if the small-scale (diffractive) density fluctuations responsible for angular broadening are isotropic, by refractive effects from large-scale density fluctuations.…”
Section: Imagg E Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The mean value for the image elongation is ¼ 1:2. This value is comparable to that measured for Cyg X-3 (%1.3, Wilkinson et al 1994;Molnar et al 1995) and NGC 6334B (1.2-1.5; Trotter et al 1998), within the range of anisotropies measured for the extragalactic sources seen through the Cygnus region (1.1-1.8; Spangler & Cordes 1988Desai & Fey 2001), and somewhat smaller than the value measured for the OH masers toward W49N (2-3; Desai et al 1994) and the Galactic center (%2.5; Frail et al 1994). Romani et al (1986) have predicted the anisotropy that would be induced, even if the small-scale (diffractive) density fluctuations responsible for angular broadening are isotropic, by refractive effects from large-scale density fluctuations.…”
Section: Imagg E Anisotropysupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This scale is much less than the predicted and measured values of the inner scale, which fall in the range 10 2 to 5.5 km (14,15). The amplitude of turbulence in the Galactic Center scattering screen is ∼ 2 − 3 orders of magnitude greater than what is seen in the next most powerful scattering region, NGC 6334B (16), however, suggesting that the Galactic Center case may be atypical.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…In the case of an image produced by interstellar electron scattering on baselines longer than the inner scale of turbulence, β is the power-law index of electron density fluctuations (13). The parameter β is related to the exponent α of the scattering law (size ∝ λ α ) as β = α + 2, allowing an independent check of the λ 2 law (13,14,15). For the case of the Galactic Center scattering we expect β = 4, in which case Equation 1 is a Gaussian function and x and y are the FWHM in the two axes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inner scale may be a few hundred kilometers in the interstellar medium (Spangler & Gwinn 1990). The measured ≈2:1 anisotropy of the scatter broadening of Sgr A * is typical for heavily scattered lines of sight (Desai & Fey 2001); it may indicate that density fluctuations responsible for scattering are aligned with a large-scale magnetic field (Desai et al 1994;Goldreich & Sridhar 1995).…”
Section: Interstellar Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 93%