2016
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201504775
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic Growth of Nonlayered CdS on MoS2 Monolayer for Functional Vertical Heterostructures

Abstract: wileyonlinelibrary.comconventional heterostructures is strongly dictated by lattice mismatch which determines the interface quality and thus, the heterostructure performance. Beyond the traditional group IV, III-V, or II-VI semiconductors, 2D layered crystals (e.g., graphene, [ 3 ] transition metal dichalcogenides, [ 4 ] hexagonal boron nitride ( h -BN), [ 5 ] phosphorene, [ 6 ] etc.) have emerged as promising candidates for next generation electronics and optoelectronics due to their unique properties. These… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
102
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(35 reference statements)
6
102
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1b shows the optical microscope (OM) images at different magnifications of some perovskite platelets grown on graphene/SiO 2 /Si substrates. It can be seen that MAPbBr 3 nucleates randomly on the graphene surface and grows fast laterally due to the small migration free energy barrier along the graphene surface 10,25,31. The lateral sizes of many MAPbBr 3 platelets can reach 5 µm as observed in a large‐scale OM image (Figure S1, Supporting Information), while the average thickness is usually less than 100 nm, confirming the highly anisotropic growth of perovskites.…”
Section: Selective Growthmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 1b shows the optical microscope (OM) images at different magnifications of some perovskite platelets grown on graphene/SiO 2 /Si substrates. It can be seen that MAPbBr 3 nucleates randomly on the graphene surface and grows fast laterally due to the small migration free energy barrier along the graphene surface 10,25,31. The lateral sizes of many MAPbBr 3 platelets can reach 5 µm as observed in a large‐scale OM image (Figure S1, Supporting Information), while the average thickness is usually less than 100 nm, confirming the highly anisotropic growth of perovskites.…”
Section: Selective Growthmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Beyond 2D/2D stacks, mixed‐dimensional ( n D/2D or 2D/ n D, where n = 1 or 3) vdW heterostructures are more difficult to synthesize due to nonpassivated and subtle interfaces. Nevertheless, there have been some reports on mixed‐dimensional vdW heterostructures, such as PbS/graphene,8 PbS/MoS 2 ,9 CdS/MoS 2 ,10 MoS 2 /GaN,11 perovskite/WS 2 ,12 and MoS 2 /Si13,14 prepared by delicate high‐temperature physical/chemical vapor deposition (CVD) methods, which differ from stacking of 2D materials by mechanical methods. The contact areas of these heterojunctions are usually less than 1 × 1 µm 2 as a result of the nonpassivated interface of at least of one material 8–11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the low activity and rapid photocorrosion make pure CdS photocatalyst unfavorable for hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) because photogenerated electron and hole pairs cannot be efficiently separated and transferred [14,15]. Loading cocatalysts on CdS to create hierarchical structures provides high activation potentials for HER and suppresses the photocorrosion of CdS [16][17][18]. For example, Pt as a cocatalyst could improve the photocatalytic HER efficiency of CdS [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High quality, large-area and single-layer MoS 2 can be fabricated by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [5][6], but the grain boundary (GB) is inevitable and difficult to be identified. GBs affect the electron transfer process, and degrade the electrical and mechanical performances of MoS 2 , which limit the application of MoS 2 [7][8][9][10]. In previous reports, GBs were studied using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [11], transmission electron microscopy (TEM) [12] and electron diffraction; hence several factors were inevitable, such as the requirement for complicated sample preparation, time delays, and a limited observation area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%