2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.88.023010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic cosmic ray diffusion and its implications for gamma-ray astronomy

Abstract: Analyses of TeV-PeV cosmic ray (CR) diffusion around their sources usually assume either isotropic diffusion or anisotropic diffusion due to the regular Galactic magnetic field. We show that none of them are adequate on distances smaller than the maximal scale lmax ∼ 100 pc of fluctuations in the turbulent interstellar magnetic field. As a result, we predict anisotropic gamma-ray emissions around CR proton and electron sources, even for uniform densities of target gas. The centers of extended emission regions … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On short scales, high energy CR particles are rather traveling along magnetic flux tubes as bulk movement (e.g., Giacinti et al 2013) with corresponding decoherence lengths of ∼100 pc. In the most extreme case, a monoenergetic particle distribution injected near the SNR could be preserved until the CRs hit a nearby molecular cloud.…”
Section: On the Isotropic Diffusion Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On short scales, high energy CR particles are rather traveling along magnetic flux tubes as bulk movement (e.g., Giacinti et al 2013) with corresponding decoherence lengths of ∼100 pc. In the most extreme case, a monoenergetic particle distribution injected near the SNR could be preserved until the CRs hit a nearby molecular cloud.…”
Section: On the Isotropic Diffusion Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MC-J1729 can dominate the TeV emission outside the SNR assuming isotropic diffusion by adopting a reasonable three-dimensional molecular cloud structure. There is no need to invoke anisotropic CR diffusion (Jokipii 1966;Nava & Gabici 2013;Malkov et al 2013;Giacinti et al 2013) to boost the CR density in a particular direction.…”
Section: On the Isotropic Diffusion Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jets would then be a visualisation of the ISM magnetic field in the surroundings of IGR J11014-6103 (compare the ISM magnetic field lines in e.g. Giacinti et al 2013; see also the discussions on the Double Helix Nebula, Morris et al 2006;Torii et al 2014). There is no obvious reason for which the underlying ISM structure would be comprised of similar conical helices converging towards the pulsar location; however, we note that the motion of the pulsar in the ISM could affect the distribution of the surrounding ISM material together with its magnetic field, for example through magnetic draping effects (e.g.…”
Section: Main Jetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We show that the local magnetic field configuration within a CR mean free path from Earth naturally results in CR flux anisotropies at small and medium scales [1]. Second, we point out that TeVPeV CRs should be expected to diffuse strongly anisotropically in the interstellar medium on scales smaller than the maximum scale of spatial fluctuations of the field, ∼ 100 pc [2,3]. This notably questions the usual assumptions on CR diffusion around sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Therefore, CR distributions around recent sources should look anisotropic and irregular. This has important implications for γ-ray astronomy, and some first observations may hint at our findings, see [3]. Detailed comparisons at high and low photon energies of the extended γ-ray emissions around CR sources may give insights into the potential impact at low energies of CR-driven instabilities on the surrounding ISM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%