2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-022-03062-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisotropic compact stars with Karmarkar condition in energy-momentum squared gravity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 48 ] It has been observed that CSs are not physically viable and stable at the center in ffalse(scriptR,T2false)$f(\mathcal {R},\mathcal {T}^{2})$ theory. [ 49 ] Here, we have found that all the considered CSs are physically viable and stable in this modified theory.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…[ 48 ] It has been observed that CSs are not physically viable and stable at the center in ffalse(scriptR,T2false)$f(\mathcal {R},\mathcal {T}^{2})$ theory. [ 49 ] Here, we have found that all the considered CSs are physically viable and stable in this modified theory.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In the realm of f (R) theory, the results indicate the instability of the Her X-1 compact star associated with the second gravity model due to the limited range satisfied by the physical quantities [96]. Furthermore, in the framework of f (R, T 2 ) theory, it is found that compact stars are neither physically viable nor stable at the center [97]. In light of these findings, it can be concluded that all considered compact stars exhibit both physical viability and stability in this modified theory.…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We have analyzed the viability and stability of compact stars with different matter distributions in f (, 𝕋 2 ) theory. [49] Recently, Yousaf et al [50] investigated the impact of a newly developed modified f (, 𝕋 2 ) theory on the complexity of time-dependent dissipative/non-dissipative spherically symmetric celestial structures with and without charge.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/prop202200184mentioning
confidence: 99%