1951
DOI: 10.1364/josa.41.000676
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisopia and Perception of Space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
2

Year Published

1952
1952
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
47
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The same order of events is observed with the episcotister. In fact, the episcotister is a more effective means than f1lters for varying one of the dimensions critical to the seen displacement of the fixed objects, which is assumed to be retinal irradiation (Cibis & Haber, 1951;Gogel, 1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same order of events is observed with the episcotister. In fact, the episcotister is a more effective means than f1lters for varying one of the dimensions critical to the seen displacement of the fixed objects, which is assumed to be retinal irradiation (Cibis & Haber, 1951;Gogel, 1956).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further cause of reduction of relative acuity may be anisopia from anisoluminance (CIBIS & HABER, 1951). The possibility of its occurrence after surgery for retinal detachment was suggested by the frequency of complaints of sensation of different luminosity in the two eyes by such patients (HUDSON, 1965).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cibis and Haber (1951), Ogle (1962), and Howard and Rogers (2002) suggest that the VBE requires no revision of theories of stereopsis: Monocular intensity patterns may affect spatial position signals — because light scattering or nonlinear visual signaling may affect spatial disparity.…”
Section: Image Intensities and Visual Spacementioning
confidence: 99%