2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anisakis Sensitization in the Croatian fish processing workers: Behavioral instead of occupational risk factors?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sensitization prevalence towards A. simplex of 32.6% in the present study is consistent with findings in other studies varying from 1.8 to 50% ( 13 , 14 ). Our findings do not allow us to distinguish between A. simplex sensitization due to ingestion of seafood or due to occupational exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A sensitization prevalence towards A. simplex of 32.6% in the present study is consistent with findings in other studies varying from 1.8 to 50% ( 13 , 14 ). Our findings do not allow us to distinguish between A. simplex sensitization due to ingestion of seafood or due to occupational exposure.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Infection with live larvae are meant to be a prerequisite to sensitization but dead larvae can also lead to allergic reactions such as asthma, rhino conjunctivitis and dermatitis when inhaled or by direct contact ( 9 , 11 , 12 ). Sensitization levels toward A. simplex in the seafood processing industries are shown to vary from 1.8 to 50% ( 13 , 14 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourteen A. simplex allergens have been described and classified in three groups according to its origin: excretory/secretory, somatic and cuticular proteins 7 , 17 , 26 28 . The first group includes relevant major allergens as Ani s 1 and Ani s 7, which are frequently used to measure sIgE responses to A. simplex in different populations including non-symptomatic blood donors, fish processing workers and patients suffering gastroallergic anisakiasis or chronic urticaria 9 , 17 , 29 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To detect sensitized asymptomatic patients in a population, serological methods with a combination of target allergens can be used providing they are speci c and selected to cover together 100% of infected subjects (13,14). A combination of recombinant Ani s 1 and Ani s 7 allergens recognized seems to meet these criteria as it was reported that near 100% of patients who have been sensitized during an Anisakis infection produced IgE antibodies to at least one of these allergens (15,16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although only a clinical case of Anisakis infection has been reported in Colombia ( 9) until now, the accumulated experience in other countries revealed that Anisakis infections are frequently misdiagnosed, mainly when subclinical cases not reporting the typical symptoms as urticaria, angioedema, gastrointestinal allergies and/or anaphylaxis are present (10,11). Indeed, this form of anisakiasis can be present a prevalence of 12% in some populations (12,13). By this reason, Moneo et al (11) suggested that, from a public health perspective, any epidemiologic study on Anisakis infections should include the group of sensitized asymptomatic patients, i.e., individuals with a high titer of anti-Anisakis IgE who likely presented an undiagnosed or subclinical gastric anisakiasis without allergic symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%