1990
DOI: 10.1159/000186008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anionic versus Cationic Immunoglobulin Clearance in Normal Subjects: A Novel Approach to the Evaluation of Charge Permselectivity

Abstract: The excretion of proteins differing in charge (the different immunoglobulin subclasses) and/or size (albumin, immunoglobulins) were investigated in normal subjects in a number of physiological conditions aiming at the evaluation of renal charge permselectivity. In 101 randomly selected normal subjects the urinary excretion rates of albumin, IgG4 (anionic proteins) and of total IgG (mostly cationic) were evaluated in basal conditions; the protein/creatinine urinary ratio and protein clearances were a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies in limited cohorts of dia-betic patients have confirmed the potentiality of this approach and the validity of the hypothesis (21,(24)(25)(26). Sensitive methods to detect the tiny amounts of urinary IgGs had to be developed (29,30), and clearances have been calculated to take into account possible individual variations in protein blood concentrations (29,32). Previous work in nondiabetic subjects has shown that the clearance of anionic IgGs is lower than that of neutral/ cationic IgGs (32), thus confirming in humans the restricted filtration of anionic proteins seen in animal studies and that the anionic-cationic Ig ratio is not influenced by individual protein clearance changes in physiological conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies in limited cohorts of dia-betic patients have confirmed the potentiality of this approach and the validity of the hypothesis (21,(24)(25)(26). Sensitive methods to detect the tiny amounts of urinary IgGs had to be developed (29,30), and clearances have been calculated to take into account possible individual variations in protein blood concentrations (29,32). Previous work in nondiabetic subjects has shown that the clearance of anionic IgGs is lower than that of neutral/ cationic IgGs (32), thus confirming in humans the restricted filtration of anionic proteins seen in animal studies and that the anionic-cationic Ig ratio is not influenced by individual protein clearance changes in physiological conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charge selectivity was assessed by studying the albumin/ transferrin and the IgG4/IgG1 clearance ratios [13]. The molecular radii and pI of the proteins measured were: albumin 3.8 nm, pI range 4.6 -6; transferrin 3.6 nm, pI 5.9; IgG1 5.5 nm, pI range 7 -9; IgG4 5.5 nm, pI 56.0.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The domain 1 polypeptide is positively charged due to an excess of positively charged amino acids, and it is well-known that charge can affect clearance from circulation. The glomerular filtration rate of anionic IgG has been shown to be slower than that of cationic IgG (28). Similarly, it has been demonstrated that the kidney filtration rate of dextran depends on charge, with positively charged molecules clearing faster than negatively charged molecules (29).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%