2021
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202107353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Anionic Redox Regulated via Metal–Ligand Combinations in Layered Sulfides

Abstract: breakthroughs revealed by both experimental and theoretical works. In recent reports, anionic redox can be activated in layered cathodes by A-L-A configuration, [1] where L stands for ligands and A stands for alkali metals, alkaline-earth metals, vacancies, or other elements with little hybridization with ligand orbitals. Ligands, mostly oxygen, are designed with nonbonding p electrons under A-L-A configuration to participate in charge compensation processes. However, from band structure intuition, cationic a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might lead to the common view that the TM-ligand covalency could be further enhanced by replacing oxygen with more covalent sulfur. This is supported by the sulfur-based layered structural framework during cycling in Li 2 FeS 2 , Li 1.33–2 y /3 Ti 0.67– y /3 Fe y S 2 , and NaCr 1– y V y S 2 . ,, Unlike the oxygen-based host framework in which the TM–O bond is easily broken to form an overoxidized O–O dimer or O 2 , the strong covalent TM–S bond can withstand a certain degree of structural distortion even in highly charged states. That is, the TM–S bond could provide a stable host framework for oxidized sulfur and exhibit a persistent honeycomb-ordered structure in the bulk during long cycling (Figure a,b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This might lead to the common view that the TM-ligand covalency could be further enhanced by replacing oxygen with more covalent sulfur. This is supported by the sulfur-based layered structural framework during cycling in Li 2 FeS 2 , Li 1.33–2 y /3 Ti 0.67– y /3 Fe y S 2 , and NaCr 1– y V y S 2 . ,, Unlike the oxygen-based host framework in which the TM–O bond is easily broken to form an overoxidized O–O dimer or O 2 , the strong covalent TM–S bond can withstand a certain degree of structural distortion even in highly charged states. That is, the TM–S bond could provide a stable host framework for oxidized sulfur and exhibit a persistent honeycomb-ordered structure in the bulk during long cycling (Figure a,b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Furthermore, previous studies suggest that the Ti 4+ in sulfides is inactive owing to the empty 3d orbital configuration. ,, The evolution of redox couples was closely investigated via ex situ XANES during the initial cycle with marked charged and discharged states (Figure e–i and Figure S5). In principle, the energy shifts of the Ni and Ti K-edges can be determined from the location of the white line peaks, while the valence state of S can be indirectly determined from the relative area of the pre-edge peaks, which has been suggested to be a reliable method for determining the valence state of TMs and sulfur. , There were almost no energy shifts of the Ti K-edge in the charged and discharged states, further indicating that Ti was an inactive component of the structural frameworks (Figure S5). Therefore, only Ni and S participated in charge compensation in the LLS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4e and f). 21 The pCOHP curves are grounded in the findings of plane-wave electronic structure computations, allowing for the observation of bonding, non-bonding, and anti-bonding energy domains between atoms. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 Moreover, Wang et al ingeniously manipulated the metal–ligand energy level to amplify Cr (3d)–S (2p) orbital hybridization, thereby preventing irreversible dimerization and cation migration and limiting voltage hysteresis and decay. 21 Notably, the fundamental Mn–O–Mn unit in MnO 2 encompasses two identical orbital hybridizations between O 2p and the two neighbouring Mn 3d atoms. Regulation of this Mn (3d)–O (2p) orbital hybridization is postulated to yield remarkable performance in both energy storage and electrocatalysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%