“…The ISEs based on metalloporphyrins, in the absence of a sample anion, showed a linear potential response to pH over a wide range; (carrier, pH range, potential slope): ([Mn(tpp)Cl], 3.5-10, 52) [18]; ([Sn(tpp)Cl 2 ], 3.5-10, 40) [19]; ([Co(tpp)(NO 2 )], 4-10, 40) [20]; ([MoO(tpp)(OEt)], 1.5-11, 57) [21]; ([In(oep)Cl], 2.5-4, 59) [4]; ([Cr(tpp)Cl], 6-9.5, 49) [22]; (In(HEPEAC)Cl), 7.5-10, 46) [15]; ([TiO- (tpp)], 2-11, 44) [23]; ([VO (tpp)], [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]48) [23]; ([Hf-(tpp)Cl 2 ], 7-12, 52) [23]; ([Zr(tpp)(OH) 2 ], 2-13, 43) [23,24, H 2 tpp: tetraphenylporphin, H 2 oep: octaethylporphin, HEPEAC: a porphyrin covalently attached to a polymer]. The pH adjustment of a sample solution is thus usually essential for the potentiometric determination of an anion, although the pH response is diminished in the presence of the sample anion [25][26][27][28][29][30].…”