Animated Randomness, Avatars, Movement, and Personalization in Risk Graphics

Abstract

BackgroundRisk communication involves conveying two inherently difficult concepts about the nature of risk: the underlying random distribution of outcomes and how a population-based proportion applies to an individual.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to test whether 4 design factors in icon arrays—animated random dispersal of risk events, avatars to represent an individual, personalization (operationalized as choosing the avatar’s color), and a moving avatar—might help convey randomness and how a given risk applies to an individual, thereby better aligning risk perceptions with risk estimates.MethodsA diverse sample of 3630 adults with no previous heart disease or stroke completed an online nested factorial experiment in which they entered personal health data into a risk calculator that estimated 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease based on a robust and validated model. We randomly assigned them to view their results in 1 of 10 risk graphics that used different combinations of the 4 design factors. We measured participants’ risk perceptions as our primary outcome, as well as behavioral intentions and recall of the risk estimate. We also assessed subjective numeracy, whether or not participants knew anyone who had died of cardiovascular causes, and whether or not they knew their blood pressure and cholesterol as potential moderators.ResultsAnimated randomness was associated with better alignment between risk estimates and risk perceptions (F 1,3576=6.12, P=.01); however, it also led to lower scores on healthy lifestyle intentions (F 1,3572=11.1, P<.001). Using an avatar increased risk perceptions overall (F 1,3576=4.61, P=.03) and most significantly increased risk perceptions among those who did not know a particular person who had experienced the grave outcomes of cardiovascular disease (F 1,3576=5.88, P=.02). Using an avatar also better aligned actual risk estimates with intentions to see a doctor (F 1,3556=6.38, P=.01). No design factors had main effects on recall, but animated randomness was associated with better recall for those at lower risk and worse recall for those at higher risk (F 1,3544=7.06, P=.01).ConclusionsAnimated randomness may help people better understand the random nature of risk. However, in the context of cardiovascular risk, such understanding may result in lower healthy lifestyle intentions. Therefore, whether or not to display randomness may depend on whether one’s goal is to persuade or to inform. Avatars show promise for helping people grasp how population-based statistics map to an individual case.

Impact of Game-Inspired Infographics on User Engagement and Information Processing in an eHealth Program

“…For people with low health literacy, the beneficial effect of visuals as an aid to comprehension is even more pronounced [ 17 ]. Further, certain kinds of visuals such as avatars in risk infographics may help people better comprehend how statistical risk information can apply to an individual [ 18 ]. It should be noted that many of these studies involved the delivery of quantitative risk information (eg, number of people affected by a type of cancer in a population) and not information on levels of individual behavior relative to a recommended level ( personalized behavioral feedback), which was the focus of our study.…”

Biological Principles and Threshold Concepts for Understanding Natural Selection

“…In another biological context, the utility of an animated graph for communicating the nature of risk of dying due to cardiovascular disease has been explored (Witteman et al 2014). The authors tested various design factors, in varying combinations, and using questionnaires to randomly selected individuals as respondents.…”

Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding

“…Presentation of risk in multiple formats (text, numerically, pictorially) [ 81 ] and assessment of patient comprehension through teach-back techniques are often recommended [ 82 ]. Novel technologies such as avatars and personalized graphics are also being explored to improve patient comprehension [ 83 ].…”