2002
DOI: 10.1039/b204973m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animated molecular dynamics simulations of hydrated caesium-smectite interlayers

Abstract: Computer animation of center of mass coordinates obtained from 800 ps molecular dynamics simulations of Cs-smectite hydrates (1/3 and 2/3 water monolayers) provided information concerning the structure and dynamics of the interlayer region that could not be obtained through traditional simulation analysis methods. Cs 1 formed inner sphere complexes with the mineral surface, and could be seen to jump from one attracting location near a layer charge site to the next, while water molecules were observed to migrat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
51
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
10
51
3
Order By: Relevance
“…On average, our layer spacing values for these multilayer hydrates are somewhat higher than the ones observed in other simulations, but they are very close to the simulation data that also used the CLAYFF force field. 36 The differences with other simulation data can be attributed to the different force fields used, [27][28][29][30][31]35,36,38 to the slightly different clay composition with no tetrahedral charge, 28,31,35 or the presence of both Na + and Cs + counterions in the clay interlayers. 31,35 In the range from x = 0 to x = 4.5 (0 to 100 mg water /g clay ) the simulated layer spacings are always very close to the experimental ones, being just slightly lower 17−19 or slightly higher, 23 depending on the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On average, our layer spacing values for these multilayer hydrates are somewhat higher than the ones observed in other simulations, but they are very close to the simulation data that also used the CLAYFF force field. 36 The differences with other simulation data can be attributed to the different force fields used, [27][28][29][30][31]35,36,38 to the slightly different clay composition with no tetrahedral charge, 28,31,35 or the presence of both Na + and Cs + counterions in the clay interlayers. 31,35 In the range from x = 0 to x = 4.5 (0 to 100 mg water /g clay ) the simulated layer spacings are always very close to the experimental ones, being just slightly lower 17−19 or slightly higher, 23 depending on the sample.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of the heat of hydration of Li + cations give values near −520 kJ mol −1 , compared with −405 kJ mol −1 for Na + and only −265 kJ mol −1 for Cs + cations [31]. Therefore, large alkali metal cations likely do not hydrate completely on clay surfaces, but associate rather with basal or edge oxygen atoms of the silicate [32]. Due to the sterical aspect described above they bind only partially to water molecules, frequently sharing one molecule with another cation.…”
Section: Effect Of Ammonium and Alkali Cationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sorbents at low Cs + sorbate concentrations (Jeong et al, 1996;Wauters et al, 1996;Sutton and Sposito, 2002) is applicable even under the extremely high ionic strength and pH conditions imposed. The non-labile (residual) pool of sorbed Cs + also increases in the order HC > HF > RS (see top three graphs in Fig.…”
Section: Cesium Partitioning Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%