Crossing Boundaries 2012
DOI: 10.1163/9789004233041_004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animals, Mess, Method: Post-humanism, Sociology and Animal Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But, for Taylor (2012), it is the methodological ramifications of this reassessment that are under-explored yet nonetheless crucial. Methodologies have been the mechanism by which such ontological and epistemological divisions have, in the past, been maintained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, for Taylor (2012), it is the methodological ramifications of this reassessment that are under-explored yet nonetheless crucial. Methodologies have been the mechanism by which such ontological and epistemological divisions have, in the past, been maintained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a significant and timely scholarly retrieval; as it reminds us of our longstanding co-existence with other species and the multitude of ongoing multispecies contexts, networks and encounters that we continue to be embroiled in today (Wilkie in press a). Although sociology is a relative newcomer to human-animal scholarship (Taylor 2012), HAS scholars have questioned the largely human-centric focus of social science disciplines by studying other animals too (Carter, Charles 2011;Cudworth 2011;Peggs 2012;Taylor, Signal 2011) 2 . Prior to discussing the emergence of the 'animal turn' in sociology, and highlighting the tarnished status of multispecies scholarship within this more anthropocentric wing of the academy, I will firstly consider why nonhuman animals and related issues may have 14 Rhoda Wilkie gained a higher profile in late modernity -both inside and outside of the academy (Franklin in Armstrong, Simmons, 2007: 1). Societal and Scholarly Turn Towards Nonhuman Animals: Why Now?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the humanities and social sciences, the Anthropocene invites an interrogation of how its diagnosis jars with the more hopeful imaginings for humanity that characterised the Enlightenment period and the emergence of modern thought (see for example Lorimer 2015, Rose & van Dooren 2011, Cook at al 2015and Head 2015. As humanity sought to break from the divine order during this period, human rationality and empirical science were embraced as the vehicles with which humans would tame and order an uncivilised and primitive nature in order to transform it into a platform upon which human advancement could take place (Kaika 2005, Taylor 2012). …”
Section: Significant Others In the Anthropocenementioning
confidence: 99%