2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaa.2012.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animals and inequality in Chalcolithic central Anatolia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Understanding how new political and economic models affected indigenous cultures and societies is one of the major challenges in archaeology, mainly tackled through changes in material cultures [ 1 ]. Using the animal remains from archaeological sites as a proxy of cultural changes is an alternative approach; which considers that animal husbandry and consumption are both highly culturally driven [ 2 ] and central within complex social environments, where their value is both economic and social [ 3 , 4 ]. Such an approach relies on the demographic and morphological changes in domestic animals [ 5 , 6 ], and it has proven to be highly efficient in documenting their role in the social complexification in Middle Chalcolithic Anatolia [ 3 ] and during the Romanization of Britain [ 7 ], Gaul [ 8 ] and Iberia [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding how new political and economic models affected indigenous cultures and societies is one of the major challenges in archaeology, mainly tackled through changes in material cultures [ 1 ]. Using the animal remains from archaeological sites as a proxy of cultural changes is an alternative approach; which considers that animal husbandry and consumption are both highly culturally driven [ 2 ] and central within complex social environments, where their value is both economic and social [ 3 , 4 ]. Such an approach relies on the demographic and morphological changes in domestic animals [ 5 , 6 ], and it has proven to be highly efficient in documenting their role in the social complexification in Middle Chalcolithic Anatolia [ 3 ] and during the Romanization of Britain [ 7 ], Gaul [ 8 ] and Iberia [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other world regions such as the Near East, zooarchaeological data has proven useful for examining processes of urbanization and centralized control of animal resources, especially secondary animal products such as wool (e.g. Zeder & ; Arbuckle & ). As more sites in China are analysed, we will be able to make better assessments about the control of animal products in emerging urban centers and more accurately construct broader narratives about changing patterns in domestic animal management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chicha production is coeval with the formation of communities in the Middle Formative associated with civic architecture, suggesting that economic changes sparked the development of more rigid social boundaries and perhaps the reorganization of labor. Benjamin Arbuckle's () analysis similarly exemplifies the important role that subsistence goods can play in economic change. His research on Chalcolithic central Anatolian societies illustrates how changes in herding practices and consumption of sheep and goats were linked to the emergence of new sociopolitical environments.…”
Section: The Role Of the Economymentioning
confidence: 99%