2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1111855108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal-specific C-terminal domain links myeloblastosis oncoprotein (Myb) to an ancient repressor complex

Abstract: Members of the Myb oncoprotein and E2F-Rb tumor suppressor protein families are present within the same highly conserved multiprotein transcriptional repressor complex, named either as Myb and synthetic multivuval class B (Myb-MuvB) or as Drosophila Rb E2F and Myb-interacting proteins (dREAM). We now report that the animal-specific C terminus of Drosophila Myb but not the more highly conserved N-terminal DNA-binding domain is necessary and sufficient for (i) adult viability, (ii) proper localization to chromos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Myb is required for expression in the antenna, and its absence substantially reduces activity of ab1C neurons and behavioral avoidance to low levels of CO 2 . Interestingly, the DNA-binding domain of Myb is not required for receptor regulation, consistent with the previous observation that Myb can bind to chromatin indirectly via other members of the MMB/dREAM complex (Andrejka et al 2011). Expression of the receptor genes tested in the antenna show a pattern of repressive histone methylation (H3K9me2), an enrichment that has been previously seen in developing olfactory neurons in mammals (Magklara et al 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Myb is required for expression in the antenna, and its absence substantially reduces activity of ab1C neurons and behavioral avoidance to low levels of CO 2 . Interestingly, the DNA-binding domain of Myb is not required for receptor regulation, consistent with the previous observation that Myb can bind to chromatin indirectly via other members of the MMB/dREAM complex (Andrejka et al 2011). Expression of the receptor genes tested in the antenna show a pattern of repressive histone methylation (H3K9me2), an enrichment that has been previously seen in developing olfactory neurons in mammals (Magklara et al 2011).…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…S1B). Despite lacking all three repeats of the highly conserved Myb DNA-binding domain (Peters et al 1987), this Myb C-terminal domain is sufficient to assemble into the MMB/dREAM complex and localize to specific regions in the genome to regulate gene expression (Wen et al 2008;Andrejka et al 2011). Thus, the rescue of receptor expression in the absence of the highly conserved Myb DNA-binding domain suggests that Myb is acting via the complex at the receptor loci.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We used the following mutant and transgenic fly strains: Myb MH107 (20), mip130 (15), mip120 67-9A-9 and mip120 67-21-6 (16), mip40 EY16520 (16), E2f2 329/DS8-78A (23), Caf1 9-2⌬ (C. Geng and J. S. Lipsick, unpublished data) and Caf1 short (24) (26), Ubi-GFP-Polo and Ubi-GFP-AurB (described below), GFP-Myb (19), GFP-Myb-KW606AA and GFP-Myb C terminus (27), P[mip120-1F] (16), and P[His2Av-mRFP1] strains (28 . Two-to 4-day-old females were incubated at 37°C for 1 h on 2 successive days to induce FLP expression by the Hsp70 promoter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evolutionarily conserved MuvB proteins in the Drosophila melanogaster DREAM complex were found to interact with the C terminus of BMyb (Andrejka et al 2011). To test whether this association is direct and conserved in the human proteins, we performed a series of precipitation experiments with recombinant B-Myb and MuvB proteins from Sf9 cells (Fig.…”
Section: B-myb Requires Lin52 To Bind To Muvb But Does Not Compete Wimentioning
confidence: 99%