Animal soundscapes reveal key markers of Amazon forest degradation from fire and logging

Abstract

Safeguarding tropical forest biodiversity requires solutions for monitoring ecosystem composition over time. In the Amazon, logging and fire reduce forest carbon stocks and alter tree species diversity, but the long-term consequences for wildlife remain unclear, especially for lesser-known taxa. Here, we combined data from multi-day acoustic surveys, airborne lidar, and satellite time-series covering logged and burned forests (n=39) in the southern Brazilian Amazon to identify acoustic markers of degradation. Our findings contradict theoretical expectations from the Acoustic Niche Hypothesis that animal communities in more degraded habitats occupy fewer acoustic niches. Instead, we found that habitat structure (e.g., aboveground biomass) was not a consistent proxy for biodiversity based on divergent patterns of acoustic space occupancy (ASO) in logged and burned forests. Full 24-hr soundscapes highlighted a stark and sustained reorganization in community structure after multiple fires; animal communication networks were quieter, more homogenous, and less acoustically integrated in forests burned multiple times than in logged or once-burned forests. These findings demonstrate strong biodiversity co-benefits from protecting Amazon forests from recurrent fire activity. By contrast, soundscape changes after logging were subtle and more consistent with community recovery than reassembly. In both logged and burned forests, insects were the dominant acoustic markers of degradation, particularly during midday and nighttime hours that are not typically sampled by traditional field surveys of biodiversity. The acoustic fingerprints of degradation history were conserved across replicate recording locations at each site, indicating that soundscapes offer a robust, taxonomically inclusive solution for tracking changes in community composition over time.