Themes in Old World Zooarchaeology 2021
DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv13pk8dp.16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal remains from 17th-century Carnide, Lisbon, Portugal

Abstract: Excavations undertaken in 2012 by the Centro de Arqueologia de Lisboa (CAL), in Largo do Coreto (Bandstand square) in Carnide (Lisbon, Portugal), uncovered over 7,000 faunal remains. These came from 60 underground pits previously used for storage, especially cereal, and subsequently, between 1550 and 1660 AD, filled with domestic rubbish. Most remains belonged to mammals and birds, with a significant number of molluscs. They are presumably food waste which therefore tell us something about the way of life of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These animals could have been recovered already dead and deposited there, or they could have been deliberately killed in an effort to control their numbers. The presence of cat remains in this cistern is not unique in the literature of historical archaeology, and could be similar to cat remains found in some faunal assemblages from silos/storage pits (Detry et al, 2020; Mota & Cardoso, 2016), privies (Warner & Genheimer, 2008) and wells (Lepetz & Bourgeois, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…These animals could have been recovered already dead and deposited there, or they could have been deliberately killed in an effort to control their numbers. The presence of cat remains in this cistern is not unique in the literature of historical archaeology, and could be similar to cat remains found in some faunal assemblages from silos/storage pits (Detry et al, 2020; Mota & Cardoso, 2016), privies (Warner & Genheimer, 2008) and wells (Lepetz & Bourgeois, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%