1984
DOI: 10.3109/02713688409065600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal models for inherited cataracts: a review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
2

Year Published

1986
1986
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As pointed out previously, the onset or appearance of each grade of opacification was variable, but these variations were al most the same as those of other experimental animals [3,[7][8][9][10]. In the case that the mice strain used in this study did not regularly yield the same type of cataract formation, the difference in the results of cataract devel opment between previous investigations and our observations will be explained.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As pointed out previously, the onset or appearance of each grade of opacification was variable, but these variations were al most the same as those of other experimental animals [3,[7][8][9][10]. In the case that the mice strain used in this study did not regularly yield the same type of cataract formation, the difference in the results of cataract devel opment between previous investigations and our observations will be explained.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Because of late onset and slow develop ment of lens opacification, this mouse seemed to be a suitable animal model for studying human senile cataract [1][2][3]. Most of the previous investigations were designed to observe initial characteristic biochemical changes which correlated with lens opacifi cation in the early stage [2], however, the course of cataract development described b\ previous authors is not the same as that ol our observation.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results presented in this study also emphasize the importance of immortalizing functions on tissue development in vivo. Comparison of the pathology of the lens in the aPyLT mice to cataracts in mouse (Gelatt and Das 1984), guinea pig, and man (T. Kuwabara, unpubl.) may provide some insight to the molecular events responsible for these pathological conditions.…”
Section: Lack Of Hyperplasia and Tumor Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%