2012
DOI: 10.1038/nrmicro2911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal models for HIV/AIDS research

Abstract: The AIDS pandemic continues to present us with unique scientific and public health challenges. Although the development of effective antiretroviral therapy has been a major triumph, the emergence of drug resistance requires active management of treatment regimens and the continued development of new antiretroviral drugs. Moreover, despite nearly 30 years of intensive investigation, we still lack the basic scientific knowledge necessary to produce a safe and effective vaccine against HIV-1. Animal models offer … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
311
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(315 citation statements)
references
References 203 publications
3
311
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although macaques seem to be more responsive than humans in immunogenicity analyses, the rhesus macaque model at least allows a ranking of the immunogenicities of different vectors (20). Therefore, despite additional limitations, such as differences in the configuration of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) loci (21), monkey trials are instrumental in evaluating the numerous vaccine regimens and help in the design of human clinical trials. Importantly, the cellular immune responses observed in humans in the EV02 study were remarkably similar to those obtained in macaques immunized with the same DNA and NYVAC vaccine candidates and according to the same regimen (22), which supports the value of the rhesus macaque model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although macaques seem to be more responsive than humans in immunogenicity analyses, the rhesus macaque model at least allows a ranking of the immunogenicities of different vectors (20). Therefore, despite additional limitations, such as differences in the configuration of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC-I) loci (21), monkey trials are instrumental in evaluating the numerous vaccine regimens and help in the design of human clinical trials. Importantly, the cellular immune responses observed in humans in the EV02 study were remarkably similar to those obtained in macaques immunized with the same DNA and NYVAC vaccine candidates and according to the same regimen (22), which supports the value of the rhesus macaque model.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macaques infected with SIV mac serve as the principal animal model for pathogenic infection of humans with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), and understanding the mechanisms that underlie the dichotomy between natural-and nonnatural-host SIV infection may lead to a better understanding of mechanisms of disease progression and AIDS pathogenesis. Because SIV mac viruses arose from cross-species transfers of SIV smm from SM to RM, species-matched virus-host interactions in SM and RM serve as an ideal platform for comparative analysis (1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely utilized primate model for investigating lentiviral infection and disease is the SIV infecting rhesus macaques (SIVmac), with rhesus macaques of Indian origin being the best characterized species. 38 Rhesus macaques are not natural hosts of SIV in the wild; rather, SIVmac emerged from cross-species transmission events in US primate centers and likely originated from infected sooty mangabeys. 39,40 The adaptations allowing the virus to stably infect rhesus macaques likely occurred as a result of serial passages of the virus through multiple animals.…”
Section: Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%