2015
DOI: 10.1177/0300985815593124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal Models for Evaluation of Bone Implants and Devices

Abstract: Bone implants and devices are a rapidly growing field within biomedical research, and implants have the potential to significantly improve human and animal health. Animal models play a key role in initial product development and are important components of nonclinical data included in applications for regulatory approval. Pathologists are increasingly being asked to evaluate these models at the initial developmental and nonclinical biocompatibility testing stages, and it is important to understand the relative… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
70
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
2
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sheep and goat experimental models have increased during the last years due to relatively vertical alignment of the cervical vertebrae, which provides similar axial compression and rotation forces to the human spine. However, the main drawbacks are that sheep cortical bone remains predominant at 7-9 years of age, it undergoes seasonal bone loss and sheep and goats have more dense and stronger bones when compared to humans bone [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sheep and goat experimental models have increased during the last years due to relatively vertical alignment of the cervical vertebrae, which provides similar axial compression and rotation forces to the human spine. However, the main drawbacks are that sheep cortical bone remains predominant at 7-9 years of age, it undergoes seasonal bone loss and sheep and goats have more dense and stronger bones when compared to humans bone [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these animal models were designed to observe the degradation pattern of Mg‐based implants and the response of peri‐implant bone tissues 42,78,79. Therefore, they do not simulate clinical scenarios, or validate potential clinical applications with regards to assessment of bioefficacy of the Mg‐based implants, leading to lack of information on design input as well as output to meet regulatory requirement 80. Herein, we summarize the representative animal models to target at clinical indications by using Mg‐based orthopedic implants for both biosafety and bioefficacy evaluation ( Figures and ).…”
Section: Animal Models For Studying Mg‐based Orthopedic Implantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…97, 98 Although non-human primates offer the most similarity to human bone with respect to anatomy and physiology, mini-pigs are more widely used because of less critical ethical issues and low purchase and maintenance costs, in addition to easy handling. Unlike pigs, dogs (the “canine model”) with stand repetitive blood sampling during PRP preparation, and their mandibles are large enough to receive commercial implants.…”
Section: Implications For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%