2021
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.626553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal Models for COVID-19: Hamsters, Mouse, Ferret, Mink, Tree Shrew, and Non-human Primates

Abstract: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a novel coronavirus causing acute respiratory tract infection in humans. The virus has the characteristics of rapid transmission, long incubation period and strong pathogenicity, and has spread all over the world. Therefore, it is of great significance to select appropriate animal models for antiviral drug development and therapeutic effect evaluation. Here, we review and compare the current animal models of SARS-CoV-2.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
1
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 126 publications
(224 reference statements)
1
86
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many nonhuman primate species including rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis), African green monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) and pigtail macaques reported here (Macaca nemestrina), have been critical for investigating COVID-19 disease and pre-clinical testing of COVID-19 vaccines (31,32). Recent findings from Melton et al, demonstrate moderate SARS-CoV-2 disease in pigtail macaques (33), as compared to the more mild disease observed in rhesus macaques, but with similar levels of viral load in respiratory mucosa between the two species (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many nonhuman primate species including rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta), cynomolgus macaques (Macaca fascicularis), African green monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) and pigtail macaques reported here (Macaca nemestrina), have been critical for investigating COVID-19 disease and pre-clinical testing of COVID-19 vaccines (31,32). Recent findings from Melton et al, demonstrate moderate SARS-CoV-2 disease in pigtail macaques (33), as compared to the more mild disease observed in rhesus macaques, but with similar levels of viral load in respiratory mucosa between the two species (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal models that are susceptible to several human respiratory viruses, such as ferrets and golden Syrian hamsters, are also valuable to evaluate the effects of concurrent and sequential viral infections on disease severity, immune response and the mechanisms of virus‒virus interaction at the host level ( 16 ). However, the immune response against human respiratory viruses and the mechanisms of immune evasion might differ between animal models and humans, which constitutes a potential limitation.…”
Section: Advantages and Limitations Of Ex Vivo And In Vivo Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncontrolled induction of inflammation is one of the hallmarks of pathology after infection with SARS-CoV-2 16 . Therefore, the lungs of the vaccinated and control animals were assayed for cytokine (IFN-γ, IFN-α, IL-10, IL-6, IL-4, IL-2, IL-21, IL-17, TGF-β1, TNF-α) and chemokine (CCL5, CCL3) expression by qRT-PCR (Primer and probe sequences, Table S2), normalized to γ-actin and expressed as fold-changes over the average expression of three uninfected, unchallenged hamsters.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By day 14 p.c., the inflammation was completely cleared in the vaccinated animals and significantly reduced in the control unvaccinated group, and the antigen was absent in the lungs of both groups, which is a common feature of the hamster model. The hamster model is well established for SARS CoV-2 as it mimics the human lung pathology seen in COVID-19 patients 16 . This study concludes that SARS CoV-2 challenged CORAVAX vaccinated animals never developed the severe inflammation associated with the disease (compared with the control animals).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%