1997
DOI: 10.1038/387247a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal mitochondrial DNA recombination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
150
0
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 252 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
7
150
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the TPMM incorporates rare but major changes in repeat array size alongside a more conservative mode of change, and Di Rienzo et al (1994) discuss evidence for microsatellites that this may be due to more than one mutational pathway. A similar situation may exist for mtVNTRs where slipped strand mispairing (the misalignment of repeat units during replication, Levinson & Gutman 1987) might be responsible for the frequent small changes observed in many systems, with inter-or intramolecular recombination (Lunt & Hyman 1997) causing gross changes in array size.…”
Section: Models Of the Mutational Processmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus the TPMM incorporates rare but major changes in repeat array size alongside a more conservative mode of change, and Di Rienzo et al (1994) discuss evidence for microsatellites that this may be due to more than one mutational pathway. A similar situation may exist for mtVNTRs where slipped strand mispairing (the misalignment of repeat units during replication, Levinson & Gutman 1987) might be responsible for the frequent small changes observed in many systems, with inter-or intramolecular recombination (Lunt & Hyman 1997) causing gross changes in array size.…”
Section: Models Of the Mutational Processmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Slippedstrand mispairing (Levinson & Gutman 1987), illegitimate elongation (Buroker et al 1990) and recombination (Lunt & Hyman 1997) are all mechanisms for altering mtVNTR copy number, and indeed may all act at different times in the history of a repeat array. While slipped-strand mispairing and illegitimate elongation may produce the most frequent changes, copy-number changes may be less dramatic than intramolecular recombination which is known to cause large deletions in the Meloidogyne repeat arrays (Lunt & Hyman 1997) and may cause very rapid shifts in copy number.…”
Section: How Does Mutation Change Copy Number?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inversions may be the result of intra-mitochondrial recombination (Dowton and Campbell, 2001;Lunt and Hyman, 1997). This mechanism may also lead to the formation of mini-circles (Dowton and Austin, 1999) and might also account for the heterogeneous gene contents observed in some clades, see Section 2.2.…”
Section: Genome Rearrangementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, possible indirect evidence of recombination in vivo comes from variable-number tandem repeat sequences, found in the mtDNA of many vertebrates and invertebrates (Wolstenholme 1992;Hoelzel 1993). It is thought that the variation in copy number is generated by unequal exchange or gene conversion, in some species at least, and this has been recently con¢rmed in vivo in the phytonematode Meloidogyne javanica (Lunt & Hyman 1997).…”
Section: Pathwaysmentioning
confidence: 99%