1949
DOI: 10.1037/h0060434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal hypnosis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

1966
1966
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Arguing against the notion that immobility may inhibit aggression, Gilman and Marcuse (1949) maintained that for such an adaptive advantage to be conferred, the captured animal would have to recognize the opportunity for escape when it came. However, such a teleology need not be imposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arguing against the notion that immobility may inhibit aggression, Gilman and Marcuse (1949) maintained that for such an adaptive advantage to be conferred, the captured animal would have to recognize the opportunity for escape when it came. However, such a teleology need not be imposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods for inducing animal hypnosis are classified into four prin cipal categories: repetitive stimuli, pressure on parts of the body, inversion and restraint from movement (8). Of these, inversion and pressure on parts of the body were employed in the present experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reflex, however, was well-known to the pharaohs (Exodus VII:9-12) when handling the false cobra (Malpolon moilensis). Certain postures, restraints, and rhythmic stimulation inducing immobility have led psychologists and others to use the term ''animal hypnosis'' to describe the state where animals display reduced sensitivity to light, sound, and touch (Gilman & Marcuse 1949;Volgyesi 1966;Carli 1977;Henningson 1994;Leite-Panissi & Menescal-de-Oliviera 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%