Animal experimentation; a series of statements indicating its value to biological and medical science

Abstract

2. Chiefly, however, because we are already under restrictions, answerable to our superior officers (trustees, etc.), men and women who are among the best and most conscientious in the community. We are also answerable to our students, men and women of mature age, some themselves teachers. Visitors, moreover, honestly seeking the truth, are, and always will be, welcome. Governor Claflin, who appears to have signed with the petitioners, is, I believe, a trustee of Boston University, and ought therefore to be able to control experimentation in its laboratories. 3. Above all, we object because we honestly believe that there are no abuses in Massachusetts requiring this odious legislation. Who are the experimental biologists at whom this bill is aimed ? They are well-known men, of character and reputation, vouched for by men like President Eliot, General Walker, Bishop Lawrence, President Capen, and similar citizens. I protest that these annual attacks, which are based upon no sound evidence of abuse, or likelihood of abuse, in Massachusetts, are utterly uncalled for, unjust, and ought to cease.

Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective

“…By the end of the nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth century, the pharmacopeia had effective, scientifically tested drugs, a landmark that allowed for an increasing number of people to understand the importance and validity of scientifically sound medical knowledge and, with it, the relevance of animal-based research (see [ 113 , 136 , 137 , 138 ]). One could still find as far as the end of the nineteenth century, however, physicians who disregarded the ideals of scientific medicine and vigorously stood by their traditional epistemological view of medicine and clinical practice, which they saw as more of a form of art than as a science.…”