2007
DOI: 10.1086/519856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Animal Dispersal Dynamics Promoting Dioecy over Hermaphroditism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This analysis was motivated by recent models of the seed shadow handicap (Heilbuth et al 2001, Barot and Gignoux 2004, Vamosi et al 2007, and the finding that the difference in seed size between dioecious and hermaphroditic species may be greater in shrubs than in trees (see Fig. This analysis was motivated by recent models of the seed shadow handicap (Heilbuth et al 2001, Barot and Gignoux 2004, Vamosi et al 2007, and the finding that the difference in seed size between dioecious and hermaphroditic species may be greater in shrubs than in trees (see Fig.…”
Section: Longevitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This analysis was motivated by recent models of the seed shadow handicap (Heilbuth et al 2001, Barot and Gignoux 2004, Vamosi et al 2007, and the finding that the difference in seed size between dioecious and hermaphroditic species may be greater in shrubs than in trees (see Fig. This analysis was motivated by recent models of the seed shadow handicap (Heilbuth et al 2001, Barot and Gignoux 2004, Vamosi et al 2007, and the finding that the difference in seed size between dioecious and hermaphroditic species may be greater in shrubs than in trees (see Fig.…”
Section: Longevitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, on average, females of dioecious species must produce twice as many viable offspring as individuals of closely related cosexual species to maintain a similar population growth rate (Charnov and Maynard Smith 1976, Charlesworth and Charlesworth 1978). Third, dioecious species are predicted to suffer from an increased seed-shadow ''handicap'' compared to cosexual species (Janzen 1971, Heilbuth et al 2001, Wilson and Harder 2003, Barot and Gignoux 2004, Vamosi et al 2007). Increases in seed size may be a common response to such selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such circumstances could create an opportunity for unisexual individuals to invade ancestrally mixed populations. More recent modelling has also shown that successful dispersal of a high proportion of propagules through animal dispersal can favour the evolution of stable dioecious populations [4,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rarity may reflect demographic costs associated with dioecy (Bawa 1980): when a large proportion of the population are males, population growth is reduced-all else being equal-relative to when all individuals produce seeds. Having fewer seedproducing individuals is thus expected to constitute a substantial fitness disadvantage (Queenborough et al 2007;Vamosi et al 2007Vamosi et al , 2008. Nonetheless, dioecy has evolved independently at least 100 times (Charlesworth 2002;Barrett 2010) and is represented among almost half of angiosperm families (Renner and Ricklefs 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%