Anhang

Samida, Stefanie; Eggert, Manfred K. H.; Hahn, Hans

doi:10.1007/978-3-476-05346-6_6

Cited by 4 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The construction of images of the past in exhibitions, popular film and other media was the focus of several publications (e.g. Gehrke and Sénécheau 2010; Ickerodt 2004; Kaenel and Jud 2002; Kerig 2005; Mainka-Mehling 2008; Rahemipour 2009; Röder 2015; Samida 2011), as were practices of re-enactment, living history (Ickerodt 2009; Samida 2014) and gender stereotypes (Röder 2014).…”

Section: Recent Developments In German-speaking Archaeologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In addition – and in contrast to anglophone archaeology – GSA has a very ambivalent perception of Heidegger due to his active role in Nazi Germany (see Eggert 2011, 229; Hofmann 2016a, 285; Sommer 2000a). Moreover, several scholars have critically reviewed the relevance of early ‘thing theory’ in German philosophy of the 19th and 20th centuries (Hahn, Eggert and Samida 2014, 5, 10; Jung 2016).…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…human action and perceptions (Stockhammer 2015a). In contrast to anglophone archaeology, materielle Kultur (material culture) is still the most frequent term, whereas Ding (thing) has not achieved a popularity equal to that in current anglophone archaeology (Hahn, Eggert and Samida 2014, 2–3; Hofmann and Schreiber 2014). 21…”

Section: Spacementioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Beyond antiquarianism. A review of current theoretical issues in German-speaking prehistoric archaeology

Hofmann¹,

Stockhammer²

2017

Arch. Dial.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Whereas German-speaking archaeology (GSA) has long been understood as generally uninterested in theoretical debates, the situation has taken a most interesting development since the year 2000. Archaeologists tried to escape the general decline of the small university disciplines by getting more and more involved in the overarching research questions of cultural studies and in large-scale collaborative projects. The necessity of integrating a clear theoretical and methodological approach for a successful proposal and the subsequent research changed the significance of theoretical discussions. As a consequence, theme-oriented research has developed which aims at addressing overarching themes in the cultural and social sciences. We have chosen five of the most prominent themes in German-speaking archaeologyself-reflexivity, identities, space, cultural encounter and knowledge transfer -as well as material culture, and shed light on their theoretical conceptualization and methodological implementation in recent publications. Despite the lack of dominant schools of thinking, its strong rootedness in the evaluation of empirical sources, and its close link to the discipline of history, current GSA can contribute to the overall theoretical discourse of the discipline.

show abstract

Section: Recent Developments In German-speaking Archaeologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Beyond antiquarianism. A review of current theoretical issues in German-speaking prehistoric archaeology

Hofmann¹,

Stockhammer²

2017

Arch. Dial.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Inside and outside these collaborative projects, a large number of monographs and anthologies with a clear focus on methodological and theoretical issues have been published in the last decade (see Eggert and Veit 2013). Furthermore, a number of handbooks and introductions were published that focused on interpretive approaches, themes and questions (e. g. Bernbeck 1997;Eggert 2006;Eggert and Samida 2009;Haupt 2012;Mölders and Wolfram 2014;Samida, Eggert and Hahn 2014), which are increasingly used in bachelor's and master's programmes, where theoretical perspectives for a long time had not played a significant role at all.…”

Section: Recent Developments In German-speaking Archaeologymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Whereas the largest part of German cultural anthropology has not been interested in material culture for the last few decades, the important influence of the anthropologist Hans Peter Hahn on GSA has to be emphasized (e.g. Hahn 2004;Hahn and Soentgen 2011;Samida, Eggert and Hahn 2014). Inspired by Hahn's concepts of the Aneignung (appropriation) and Eigensinn (obstinacy) of things, by actornetwork theory and by anglophone archaeology and anthropology, GSA has recently tried to develop a better understanding of complex human-thing interactions or entanglements, 20 and to better understand the role of material culture in this relationship.…”

Section: Materials Culturementioning

confidence: 99%

Farewell to antiquarianism. A new ‘grand narrative’ for German-speaking prehistoric archaeology?

Veit¹

2017

Arch. Dial.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

I would first like to thank the editors of Archaeological dialogues for inviting me to comment on Kerstin P. Hofmann and Philipp W. Stockhammer's paper on the present situation of archaeological theory in German-speaking prehistoric archaeology (GSA). The message the authors wish to communicate to an international audience is relatively simple and straightforward. GSA, which for a long time seemed ‘generally uninterested in theoretical debates’ (p. 1), has since about the year 2000 radically changed its outlook. This change is seen reflected in a large corpus of theoretically oriented case studies (represented in a list of some four hundred titles added to the paper), that in the eyes of the authors deserves the attention of the international scientific community. This positive development is interpreted as a result both of a growing interest in overarching research questions of cultural studies and of the public funding of large-scale cooperative research projects.

show abstract

Triathlon – auf der Strecke und darüber hinaus. Eine Ethnografie zur Erfahrung von Körper, Bewegung und Raum

Krahn¹

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The «bricoleur» is adept at performing a large number of diverse tasks; but, unlike the engineer, he does not subordinate each of them to the availability of raw materials and tools conceived and procured for the purpose of the project. His universe of instruments is closed and the rules of his game are always to make do with «whatever is at hand», that is to say with a set of tools and materials which is always finite and is also heterogeneous because what it contains bears no relation to the current project, or indeed to any particular project, but is the contingent result of all the occasions there have been to renew or enrich the stock or to maintain it with the remains of previous constructions or destructions. The set of the «bricoleur's» means [. . . ] is to be defined only by its potential use or, putting this another way and in the language of the «bricoleur» himself, because the elements are collected or retained on the principle that «they may always come in handy». Such elements are specialized up to a point, sufficiently for the «bricoleur» not to need the equipment and knowledge of all trades and professions, but not enough for each of them to have only one definite and determinate use".Der Umfang der einzelnen Unterkapitel, bei denen ich mich mit den angewandten Methoden auseinandersetze, sind unterschiedlich umfangreich ausgefallen. Dies spiegelt weder eine Wertigkeit der Methoden wider, noch den Umfang, in dem sie Anwendung fanden. Viel eher habe ich bewusst versucht, methodologische Überlegungen an den Stellen auszubauen, an denen mein Feld diese Überlegungen erforderlich gemacht hat -diese Anforderungen variieren. Besonders augenscheinlich ist dies bei den Methoden, die im Fachzusammenhang in den Kulturwissenschaften nicht omnipräsent sind. Darunter fallen beispielsweise die Autoethnografie, die Bewegten Interviews und die Mental Maps. Auch die Fotoethnografie hat ein hohes Mass an methodisch-analytischer Auseinandersetzung erfordert, auch wenn die Analysen dieser Materialien innerhalb der Arbeit nur einen kleinen Teil ausmachen. Das Kapitel 5 stellt eine Ethnografie der praktizierenden Triathlet * innen dar, die zwar nicht alle relevanten Aspekte behandelt, doch szenenspezifische Besonderheiten herausarbeitet. Daher ist dieses Kapitel besonders umfangreich ausgefallen. Allen Kapiteln ausser der Einleitung und dem Schlussteil habe ich kurze inhaltliche Übersichten vorangestellt. Den Kapiteln 2 -4 habe ich übergeordnete Fazite angefügt, in den Kapiteln 5 und 6 finden sich derartige Zusammenfassungen zu den einzelnen Unterkapiteln -entsprechend der thematischen Weitläufigkeit dieser Kapitel. Ausserdem habe ich die aus dem Triathlon entlehnten Begrifflichkeiten, die in den Hauptüberschriften wiederzufinden sind, um Erklärungen aus dem Bereich des Triathlons ergänzt, wie im Abschnitt zum Wettkampfreglement geschehen. Ich verbrachte viele Stunden schwimmend, radfahrend und rennend, unterrichtete Trainings, war allein, mit Freunden, mit beforschten Triathlet * innen, im Wald, auf der Finnenbahn, in ...

show abstract

Anhang

Cited by 4 publications

References 11 publications

Beyond antiquarianism. A review of current theoretical issues in German-speaking prehistoric archaeology

Beyond antiquarianism. A review of current theoretical issues in German-speaking prehistoric archaeology

Farewell to antiquarianism. A new ‘grand narrative’ for German-speaking prehistoric archaeology?

Triathlon – auf der Strecke und darüber hinaus. Eine Ethnografie zur Erfahrung von Körper, Bewegung und Raum

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About