1975
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1975.1141029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angular jitter in an amplitude comparison monopulse radar due to turbulence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the sources of errors are noise, interference by extraneous signals, and self-interference caused by incoherent radiation; the assessment of the system accuracy in the presence of these error sources is a topic of great technical relevance which in the past received considerable attention. In particular, the self-interference by incoherent radiation was studied in connection to clear air turbulence [Valley, 1975;Knepp, 1976], but only recently, it has been recognized that at millimeter waves, the incoherent radiation arising from precipitation particles can also be a source of problems for radio systems owing to possible drawbacks such as extra noise, linear distortion, and &polarization [Ishimaru and Lin, 1972;Capsoni et al, 1976;Olsen et al, 1976;Capsoni and Paraboni, Copyright 1982 by the American Geophysical Union.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the sources of errors are noise, interference by extraneous signals, and self-interference caused by incoherent radiation; the assessment of the system accuracy in the presence of these error sources is a topic of great technical relevance which in the past received considerable attention. In particular, the self-interference by incoherent radiation was studied in connection to clear air turbulence [Valley, 1975;Knepp, 1976], but only recently, it has been recognized that at millimeter waves, the incoherent radiation arising from precipitation particles can also be a source of problems for radio systems owing to possible drawbacks such as extra noise, linear distortion, and &polarization [Ishimaru and Lin, 1972;Capsoni et al, 1976;Olsen et al, 1976;Capsoni and Paraboni, Copyright 1982 by the American Geophysical Union.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%