2015
DOI: 10.1080/10632921.2015.1039740
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angola and Kenya Pavilions in the 2013 Venice Biennale: African Contemporary Art and Cultural Diplomacy in the “Olympics of Art”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Art commentators described this period as a "renaissance" in Kenya's visual art scene (Ogana 2003, 11;Swigert 2011), while artists called it a "cultural awakening" (Jager 2011, 418). This art "renaissance" largely bypassed government patronage, which remained patchy and often shambolic (Wakanyote 2006, 24-25;Maina, 2006, 37-38;Zaugg and Nishimura 2015).…”
Section: The Rise and Fall Of Kuona Trust (Craig Halliday)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Art commentators described this period as a "renaissance" in Kenya's visual art scene (Ogana 2003, 11;Swigert 2011), while artists called it a "cultural awakening" (Jager 2011, 418). This art "renaissance" largely bypassed government patronage, which remained patchy and often shambolic (Wakanyote 2006, 24-25;Maina, 2006, 37-38;Zaugg and Nishimura 2015).…”
Section: The Rise and Fall Of Kuona Trust (Craig Halliday)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be attributed to the spatial distribution of the Venice Biennale, one that is, as Emily Putnam notes (2013: 114), a 'heterotopia for the staging of nations' . The Biennale has been characterised as 'the Olympics of the art world' (Crow 2017), in reference to its central organising principle: a festival of national representations appealing to an international public, where countries are in competition to win a prize (the Golden Lion), earning points on the level of soft power and cultural diplomacy (Nye 2004;Tripp 2013;Zaugg and Nishimura 2015). Herein there is a prescribed interplay between local and global art production, between the vision of artists or curators working upon individual pavilions and the image that their commissioning nation-state wants to portray.…”
Section: Here and There: The Temporal Relationship Between Humour Distance And Proximitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is nothing surprising in this in the sense that contemporary art is often examined in relation to its capacity to disrupt and unsettle power relations (e.g., Merson, 2017). At the same time, however, the national pavilions of the Venice Biennale are connected to the agenda of cultural diplomacy, which is expected to strengthen rather than to weaken the state (e.g., Zaugg and Nishimura, 2015). Indeed, Zakharov's oeuvre was expected to gain success.…”
Section: International Relations Of the Venice Biennalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ways that states use art have emerged as an important aspect of the aesthetic turn in recent years. Art may be defined as a soft power tool (Nye, 2004: 75; see also Filimonov, 2010), a means to promote domestic or foreign policy goals (Tripp, 2013), or an element of cultural diplomacy (Zaugg and Nishimura, 2015) or of transnational diplomatic relations (Neumann, 2016: 120). Significantly, however, because these approaches locate international relations in the interstate arena, they typically emphasise the role of state actors and state-centric geopolitics -and obscure the role of other significant actors as well as political or political-economic dynamics of the art world.…”
Section: Entanglements Of Art and International Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%