Anglobal governance?

Vučetić, Srdjan

doi:10.1080/09557570903535755

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2012

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book2

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent6

Authors

Journals

Cited by 7 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The few exceptions in the field(Vitalis 2000, Henderson 2007, Shorta & Kambouri 2010, Vucetic 2010) all note the marginalization of the question of race in transatlantic IR.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us About International Relations Theory?

Johnston

2012

Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Transatlantic international relations (IR) theory has more or less neglected the international relations of East Asia. This relative neglect has come in different forms: excluding East Asian cases from analysis, including East Asian cases but miscoding or misunderstanding them, or including them but missing the fact that they do not confirm the main findings of the study. A review of the East Asia-related literature on three important clusters of theorizing-structural theories of conflict, institutional design and efficacy, and historical memory-suggests that this neglect of the region (and other regions) may come at a cost to transatlantic IR, not only in terms of data problems but also in terms of omitted or downplayed explanatory variables and theoretical arguments.

show abstract

“…The few exceptions in the field(Vitalis 2000, Henderson 2007, Shorta & Kambouri 2010, Vucetic 2010) all note the marginalization of the question of race in transatlantic IR.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%