2000
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8675(2000)020<0940:artphr>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Angler Responses to Potential Harvest Regulations in a Norwegian Sport Fishery: A Conjoint-Based Choice Modeling Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
98
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of notable exception are the works of Wattage et al (2011; and Aas et al (2000). Wattage et al (2011) uses a CE approach to determine the economic value held by the Irish public for the conservation of deep-sea corals using MPA variant management options.…”
Section: Ce and Fisheries Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of notable exception are the works of Wattage et al (2011; and Aas et al (2000). Wattage et al (2011) uses a CE approach to determine the economic value held by the Irish public for the conservation of deep-sea corals using MPA variant management options.…”
Section: Ce and Fisheries Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wattage et al (2005) demonstrated the applicability of CE in the evaluation of three over-riding management options and its ability to offer meaningful information to the management process. Furthermore, Aas et al (2000) showed CE to be particularly useful in the evaluation of various fishery management options for harvest regulation within a Norwegian recreational fishery. However, despite growing application in the industrial fishing arena, CE has been little used within low-income rural settings, terrestrially and indeed coastally (Glenk et al, 2006).…”
Section: Ce and Fisheries Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some cases the price is not a relevant attribute since it is already decided that a change will take place (regardless of the price), or for a given cost of the project, the focus is on the optimal combination of attributes, in which case the policy of interest relates to obtain the MRSs between nonmonetary attributes in order to compare the impact of different projects. For example, Aas et al, (2000) and Wattage et al (2005) use choice experiment methodology to study preferences for different fisheries management programs in Norway and the UK respectively by studying the relative importance of diverse (non-monetary) attributes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proactive management of regional fisheries, after gaining an understanding of angler behavior, can lead to changes in regulations that prevent spread of invasive species or prevent overharvest of sportfish. Furthermore, studying both angler typology and angler movement or behavior is necessary to create new management strategies to prevent conflict among user groups (Aas et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%